Defendable vs Recon InfoSec
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Recon InfoSec is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Recon InfoSec serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for Recon InfoSec (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Recon InfoSec is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Recon InfoSec serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for Recon InfoSec (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Defendable (Services firm) and Recon InfoSec (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Defendable's defendable mdr fits nordic buyers that want norwegian soc monitoring, microsoft sentinel-friendly... or Recon InfoSec's recon infosec is a strong fit for buyers who want managed security operations with broad integrat....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | Organizations that want MDR across existing endpoint, SIEM, cloud, identity, network and email tools |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Organizations that want MDR across existing endpoint, SIEM, cloud, identity, network and email tools
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | Recon InfoSecTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | LimaCharlieCrowdStrikeSentinelOneCarbon BlackBitdefender GravityZoneBlackBerry CylanceSophosTrend MicroSymantecQualys EDRRSA NetWitness EDR Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | SplunkSumo LogicStellar CyberAlienVaultArcSightGoogle ChronicleDevoElasticExabeamFortiSIEMIBM QRadarLogPointLogRhythmLogz.ioRapid7 InsightIDRRSA NetWitness |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Custom pricing. No public price bands, per-user pricing or minimums found. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | Recon MDR appears closer to full managed security operations than a narrow endpoint-only MDR SKU, so buyers should confirm the modules included in the quoted scope.. No public contractual SLA or service-credit table was found.. Default autonomous response actions are not published. Confirm which actions Recon can take without approval.. Physical SOC locations, analyst count and raw data export terms are not public. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Not published as a standard timeline. |
| Industry focus | Not published | Financial ServicesHealthcareOil and GasManufacturingUtilitiesGovernmentEducationConstructionRetail |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | Recon publishes a +97 NPS claim, customer testimonials, logos and public practitioner/community signals around OpenSOC, SOC X and Thursday Defensive. Independent third-party review volume is limited: no meaningful G2 or Gartner MDR review profile was found in this pass. Public community signal is sparse, so buyer validation should lean on references and proof-of-value work. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | SOC 2 Type II |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | AICPA SOC 2 Type IITIPS Awarded VendorTexas DIR Approved Vendor |
| Founded | 2020 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and Recon InfoSec?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Recon InfoSec is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Recon InfoSec.
How do Defendable and Recon InfoSec differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Recon InfoSec supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Defendable and included with Recon InfoSec.
How does Defendable pricing compare to Recon InfoSec?
Defendable pricing: Not published. Recon InfoSec pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found.. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with Recon InfoSec: Recon MDR appears closer to full managed security operations than a narrow endpoint-only MDR SKU, so buyers should confirm the modules included in the quoted scope.; No public contractual SLA or service-credit table was found..
Should I choose Defendable or Recon InfoSec?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose Recon InfoSec if: organizations that want MDR across existing endpoint, SIEM, cloud, identity, network and email tools. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. Recon InfoSec is not ideal for buyers requiring public pricing before engaging sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.