Defendable vs Quorum Cyber
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Quorum Cyber is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Quorum Cyber serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 4 for Quorum Cyber (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
Buyer brief
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Quorum Cyber is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Quorum Cyber serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 4 for Quorum Cyber (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
Defendable (Services firm) and Quorum Cyber (Microsoft-ecosystem) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Defendable's defendable mdr fits nordic buyers that want norwegian soc monitoring, microsoft sentinel-friendly... or Quorum Cyber's the strongest microsoft-native mdr option with a tiered model spanning smb to enterprise, backed ....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | SMBs needing affordable 24/7 MDR via Clarity Defend, with a growth path to enterprise-grade Protect tier |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- SMBs needing affordable 24/7 MDR via Clarity Defend, with a growth path to enterprise-grade Protect tier
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | Quorum CyberTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published. Contact for custom quote. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Not published. Described as 'flexible subscription model' with pricing based on environment size and risk profile. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | Requires Microsoft licensing (E3/E5 or standalone Defender licenses) as a prerequisite. These costs are separate and can be significant.. Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are usage-based and billed separately by Microsoft. Data ingestion charges can spike unpredictably.. Identity coverage (ITDR) and data security (Clarity Data) are separate services at lower tiers. AWS and GCP coverage only available in Clarity Protect (top tier) |
| Data portability | Partial | Full |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Annual |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | EuropeNorth America |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Not published |
| Industry focus | Not published | Financial ServicesEducationPublic SectorManufacturingProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | Named in the Gartner Market Guide for MDR as Representative Vendor (2024, 2025). Microsoft Security MSSP of the Year 2025. First UK Microsoft Verified MXDR provider. Very limited independent review data: no ratings on G2, PeerSpot, or Gartner Peer Insights with sufficient reviews. Zero Reddit presence. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001Cyber Essentials |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001 (UKAS-level audit)CREST (Vulnerability Assessment, Pen Testing, CSIR)Cyber EssentialsMicrosoft Verified MXDR SolutionMicrosoft Solutions Partner for SecurityMicrosoft Security MSSP of the Year 2025Gartner Market Guide for MDR Representative Vendor (2024, 2025) |
| Founded | 2020 | 2016 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | Data resides in customer's own Microsoft Sentinel instance / Azure tenant. Retention governed by customer's Azure configuration. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and Quorum Cyber?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Quorum Cyber is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Quorum Cyber.
How do Defendable and Quorum Cyber differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Quorum Cyber supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does Defendable pricing compare to Quorum Cyber?
Defendable pricing: Not published. Quorum Cyber pricing: Not published. Contact for custom quote.. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with Quorum Cyber: Requires Microsoft licensing (E3/E5 or standalone Defender licenses) as a prerequisite. These costs are separate and can be significant.; Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are usage-based and billed separately by Microsoft. Data ingestion charges can spike unpredictably..
Should I choose Defendable or Quorum Cyber?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose Quorum Cyber if: microsoft-committed organizations (E3/E5) wanting MDR built natively on Sentinel and Defender with data staying in their own Azure tenant. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. Quorum Cyber is not ideal for organizations running CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or any non-Microsoft primary EDR. Quorum Cyber is Microsoft-only..
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.