Defendable vs Pondurance
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Pondurance is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Pondurance serves SMB and Mid-market. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for Pondurance (Endpoint, Identity).
Buyer brief
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Pondurance is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Pondurance serves SMB and Mid-market. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for Pondurance (Endpoint, Identity).
Defendable (Services firm) and Pondurance (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Defendable's defendable mdr fits nordic buyers that want norwegian soc monitoring, microsoft sentinel-friendly... or Pondurance's affordable, technology-agnostic mdr for us mid-market buyers in regulated industries, with a risk....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | Organizations that want a $2M breach warranty and HITRUST readiness consulting from one vendor |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | $2,000,000 |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Organizations that want a $2M breach warranty and HITRUST readiness consulting from one vendor
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- $2,000,000
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | PonduranceTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | CrowdStrikeSentinelOne Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published. Custom quotes only. Reviews describe pricing as affordable relative to competitors. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | $2,000,000 |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Network | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Per-endpoint for endpoint MDR. Network MDR priced by bandwidth. Log MDR priced by GB/day ingestion. Custom quotes. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. Separate retainer required for the 2-hour response commitment.. Network MDR, Log MDR, and Pondurance for Microsoft are all separate products with separate pricing on top of endpoint MDR. RansomSnare module is a separate license on top of MDR (free promotion for new customers may be time-limited). Cloud, SaaS (M365), and network coverage each require purchasing separate product modules beyond base endpoint MDR |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Annual |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | North America |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Not published. Reviews describe setup as straightforward. |
| Industry focus | Not published | HealthcareFinancial ServicesGovernmentEducationManufacturingRetail |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Under 15 minutes (vendor marketing claim, described as 'typical time to remediation') |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | Gartner Peer Insights 5.0/5 but only 2 reviews, too small to draw conclusions. Named in Gartner 2024 Market Guide for MDR as the only 'risk-based' vendor. Almost no presence on G2, PeerSpot, or Reddit. Glassdoor 2.4/5 (36 reviews) with recurring complaints about leadership and employee turnover. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | – |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | Certified Common Security Framework Practitioners (CCSFP) on staff |
| Founded | 2020 | 2008 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | Not published. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and Pondurance?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Pondurance is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Pondurance.
How do Defendable and Pondurance differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Pondurance supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does Defendable pricing compare to Pondurance?
Defendable pricing: Not published. Pondurance pricing: Not published. Custom quotes only. Reviews describe pricing as affordable relative to competitors.. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with Pondurance: Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. Separate retainer required for the 2-hour response commitment.; Network MDR, Log MDR, and Pondurance for Microsoft are all separate products with separate pricing on top of endpoint MDR.
Should I choose Defendable or Pondurance?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose Pondurance if: uS mid-market organizations in healthcare, financial services, or government wanting affordable MDR for regulated environments. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. Pondurance is not ideal for international organizations needing non-US SOC coverage or multilingual support.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.