Defendable vs NVISO
Defendable and NVISO are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while NVISO serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 3 for NVISO (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Buyer brief
Defendable and NVISO are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while NVISO serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 3 for NVISO (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
NVISO offers broader coverage (3 surfaces vs. 1). Defendable may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | European mid-market and enterprise buyers that want MDR delivered from a European cybersecurity firm |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- European mid-market and enterprise buyers that want MDR delivered from a European cybersecurity firm
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | NVISOTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | Palo Alto CortexSentinelOne Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Elastic Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Custom pricing based on managed service scope, telemetry sources, portal and ITSM integration, detection analytics, threat hunting, incident response support and platform choices such as Cortex, SentinelOne or Microsoft tooling. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | No public price floor or package table was found.. The service is technology-agnostic, but buyers choosing Cortex or Microsoft tooling should price platform licensing separately.. NVISO CSIRT support backs the MDR service, but buyers should confirm which DFIR hours are included and what requires a separate retainer.. The portal exposes SLA status, but public materials do not publish fixed response-time terms or service credits.. No public breach warranty or trial was found. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | Europe |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Not published. Scope depends on telemetry sources, ITSM integration, platform choices and whether NVISO runs a dedicated, co-managed or outsourced operational model. |
| Industry focus | Not published | Financial ServicesTechnologyGovernmentManufacturingAerospaceCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | NVISO has credible European security-operations and incident-response evidence, including MITRE managed-services participation and public customer references, but public MDR-specific peer review volume is limited. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | ISO 27001GDPR |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | ISO 27001SOC 2 attestation, type not publishedSOC-CMM Gold PartnerPalo Alto Networks Cortex XMDR SpecializationMicrosoft Intelligent Security Association memberMicrosoft Security Solutions Partner |
| Founded | 2020 | 2013 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | Not published for MDR. Retention depends on the customer's monitoring platforms and contract scope. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and NVISO?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). NVISO is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for NVISO.
How do Defendable and NVISO differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. NVISO supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Defendable pricing compare to NVISO?
Defendable pricing: Not published. NVISO pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with NVISO: No public price floor or package table was found.; The service is technology-agnostic, but buyers choosing Cortex or Microsoft tooling should price platform licensing separately..
Should I choose Defendable or NVISO?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose NVISO if: european mid-market and enterprise buyers that want MDR delivered from a European cybersecurity firm. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. NVISO is not ideal for buyers needing public per-endpoint pricing before a sales call.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.