Defendable vs NetWitness
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. NetWitness is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; NetWitness serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for NetWitness (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. NetWitness is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; NetWitness serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for NetWitness (Endpoint, Network).
NetWitness is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Defendable is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | Organizations already running NetWitness Platform XDR that want managed analyst support |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 0/6 actions · Approval required |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Organizations already running NetWitness Platform XDR that want managed analyst support
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | NetWitnessPLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | NetWitness Endpoint |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | NetWitness LogsNetWitness Platform XDR |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Guided Response |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Approval Required |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Alert and notify only |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Custom quote. Public materials describe customized MDR offerings based on NetWitness Platform XDR scope, analyst support, administration needs, threat hunting, incident management and partner delivery. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | The MDR offer is tied to NetWitness Platform XDR. Buyers without NetWitness deployed should price platform licensing, deployment and operations effort alongside MDR service fees.. The public MDR datasheet describes customized services, so scope may vary by customer and delivery partner.. Current IT/OT MDR material is a NetWitness and Lumifi partnership. Buyers should confirm which company owns monitoring, escalation, response authority and support accountability.. No public price floor, public response SLA, breach warranty or trial was found. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | North America |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Not published. Scope depends on the existing NetWitness Platform XDR deployment, telemetry sources, detection content, administration needs and Lumifi or other partner involvement. |
| Industry focus | Not published | GovernmentFinancial ServicesEnergyHealthcareTransportationIndustrial |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | NetWitness has a long-running platform business, but MDR-specific public peer reviews are limited and current public materials lean on datasheets and partnership announcements. Buyers should validate references for the exact delivery model: NetWitness Professional Services, Lumifi, or another certified partner. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | – |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | – |
| Founded | 2020 | 1997 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | Not published for MDR. Retention depends on the customer's NetWitness Platform XDR and log-storage architecture. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and NetWitness?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). NetWitness is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for NetWitness.
How do Defendable and NetWitness differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. NetWitness supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting.
How does Defendable pricing compare to NetWitness?
Defendable pricing: Not published. NetWitness pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with NetWitness: The MDR offer is tied to NetWitness Platform XDR. Buyers without NetWitness deployed should price platform licensing, deployment and operations effort alongside MDR service fees.; The public MDR datasheet describes customized services, so scope may vary by customer and delivery partner..
Should I choose Defendable or NetWitness?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose NetWitness if: organizations already running NetWitness Platform XDR that want managed analyst support. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. NetWitness is not ideal for buyers wanting public per-endpoint MDR pricing.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.