Defendable vs Lumifi
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Lumifi is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Lumifi serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for Lumifi (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Lumifi is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Lumifi serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for Lumifi (Endpoint, Network).
Defendable (Services firm) and Lumifi (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Defendable's defendable mdr fits nordic buyers that want norwegian soc monitoring, microsoft sentinel-friendly... or Lumifi's pe-backed mdr roll-up with healthcare specialization, ex-military soc personnel, and a technology....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | Healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR, especially those already in the Critical Insight customer base |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR, especially those already in the Critical Insight customer base
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | LumifiTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | Microsoft Defender for EndpointSentinelOne Singularity XDRCrowdStrike FalconVMware Carbon BlackPalo Alto Cortex XDR |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | ExabeamElasticStellar CyberNetWitnessEventTracker (Netsurion platform) Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Identity | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Custom pricing based on environment size, coverage areas, and platform integrations. No public pricing information available. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. It is a separate service from the Critical Insight division, likely priced separately.. OT/ICS coverage requires the NetWitness partnership (announced Feb 2026) and is not part of standard MDR. Pricing and maturity of this offering are unknown.. Roll-up strategy means the service you buy today may have been three different companies 13 months ago. Ask about integration status between Datashield, Netsurion, and Critical Insight operations.. Zero public pricing. No way to benchmark costs before a sales conversation.. Single US SOC in Scottsdale, AZ. No follow-the-sun coverage, which may affect overnight response quality. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Annual |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | North America |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Varies by integration complexity. API-based integrations for Microsoft Sentinel, Defender, and SentinelOne can take days to weeks. |
| Industry focus | Not published | HealthcareCritical InfrastructureEnergyManufacturingFinancial ServicesLegalGovernment (local/state) |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | Gartner Peer Insights 4.9/5 (25 reviews in Managed Security Services, 6 in MDR), but very small sample size. Virtually no Reddit or G2 discussion. Glassdoor 2.9/5 (25 employee reviews) with only 39% recommending and 22% positive business outlook. Compensation rated 3.3/5, down 17% year-over-year. The Gartner rating looks good on paper but the tiny review count and lack of independent practitioner discussion make it hard to assess real-world performance. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | SOC 2 Type IINIST CSFHIPAAPCI DSS |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | SOC 2 Type II (SOC facility attestation) |
| Founded | 2020 | 2022 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | Customer data remains on customer infrastructure in co-managed model. Retention varies by platform and contract. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and Lumifi?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Lumifi is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Lumifi.
How do Defendable and Lumifi differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Lumifi supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine) and approval is configurable.
How does Defendable pricing compare to Lumifi?
Defendable pricing: Not published. Lumifi pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with Lumifi: Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. It is a separate service from the Critical Insight division, likely priced separately.; OT/ICS coverage requires the NetWitness partnership (announced Feb 2026) and is not part of standard MDR. Pricing and maturity of this offering are unknown..
Should I choose Defendable or Lumifi?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose Lumifi if: healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR, especially those already in the Critical Insight customer base. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. Lumifi is not ideal for buyers who need published MTTD/MTTR metrics, transparent pricing, or independent validation (MITRE, Forrester) before committing.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.