Defendable vs LRQA Nettitude
Defendable and LRQA Nettitude are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while LRQA Nettitude serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for LRQA Nettitude (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
Defendable and LRQA Nettitude are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while LRQA Nettitude serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for LRQA Nettitude (Endpoint, Network).
LRQA Nettitude offers broader coverage (2 surfaces vs. 1). Defendable may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | UK and international mid-market or enterprise buyers that need CREST SOC-certified MDR |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- UK and international mid-market or enterprise buyers that need CREST SOC-certified MDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | LRQA NettitudeTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | Endpoint Detection and Response tools Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | CrowdStrike Next-Gen SIEMCloud SIEM platforms Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Custom pricing. No public commercial per-user or per-endpoint price found. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Custom pricing. Public LRQA pages do not publish MDR price bands or standard per-endpoint, per-user or per-GB pricing for the MDR service. Because MDR, SOC-as-a-Service, XDR, EDR, NDR, vulnerability management and incident response are described as a modular portfolio, buyers should confirm exactly what is in the quoted scope. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | Confirm whether Incident Response and Digital Forensics are included in the MDR contract or sold as separate retainers/services.. Confirm SIEM and EDR licensing responsibilities, especially for Microsoft Sentinel or CrowdStrike Next-Gen SIEM deployments.. No public contractual SLA or service-credit table was found.. Physical SOC location, data residency and raw log export terms should be confirmed in writing. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Not published as a standard MDR onboarding timeline. |
| Industry focus | Not published | Financial ServicesGovernmentHealthcareTechnologyEnergyManufacturingTransportationRetail |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | LRQA Nettitude has strong accreditation evidence, but public buyer-review signal for the MDR service itself is thin. G2's seller profile shows 3.8/5 across two Nettitude reviews, and they are not MDR-specific. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | ISO 27001PCI DSSNCSC CIRCRESTCyber EssentialsDORANIST CSFSOC 2 |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | CREST SOCCREST Penetration TestingCREST Red TeamingCREST Incident ResponseCREST Threat IntelligenceNCSC Cyber Incident Response Assured Service ProviderMicrosoft Solutions Partner for Security |
| Founded | 2020 | 2003 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and LRQA Nettitude?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). LRQA Nettitude is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for LRQA Nettitude.
How do Defendable and LRQA Nettitude differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. LRQA Nettitude supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Defendable pricing compare to LRQA Nettitude?
Defendable pricing: Not published. LRQA Nettitude pricing: Custom pricing. No public commercial per-user or per-endpoint price found.. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with LRQA Nettitude: Confirm whether Incident Response and Digital Forensics are included in the MDR contract or sold as separate retainers/services.; Confirm SIEM and EDR licensing responsibilities, especially for Microsoft Sentinel or CrowdStrike Next-Gen SIEM deployments..
Should I choose Defendable or LRQA Nettitude?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose LRQA Nettitude if: uK and international mid-market or enterprise buyers that need CREST SOC-certified MDR. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. LRQA Nettitude is not ideal for buyers requiring public pricing before engaging sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.