Defendable vs LMNTRIX
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. LMNTRIX is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; LMNTRIX serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 4 for LMNTRIX (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. LMNTRIX is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; LMNTRIX serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 4 for LMNTRIX (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
LMNTRIX is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Defendable is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | Organizations interested in deception technology as part of their MDR stack, not as a separate product |
| Price | Custom quote | Single reviewer: under $20/user/yr; unit unclear |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 5/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Organizations interested in deception technology as part of their MDR stack, not as a separate product
- Price
- Single reviewer: under $20/user/yr; unit unclear
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | LMNTRIXPLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | LMNTRIX EDR (native)Third-party EDR log collection supported |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | LMNTRIX SIEM (native, integrated) Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not officially published. One PeerSpot reviewer reported under $20/user/year. Claims to be priced lower than competitors' licensing alone. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Per-endpoint tiered pricing. Channel-only (sold exclusively through MSSP and channel partners). |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | Channel-only: cannot buy direct, must go through an MSSP partner, which may add margin or limit negotiation. Small company with no outside funding. Ask about business continuity plans and what happens if the company is acquired or shuts down.. Portal still maturing. PeerSpot reviewers describe it as buggy, so factor in potential operational friction during onboarding.. All performance claims are self-reported with no MITRE evaluation or third-party benchmark. Insist on a POV to validate in your environment. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | SlackTeamsEmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | Europe | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Straightforward deployment with minimal configuration (per PeerSpot reviewers) |
| Industry focus | Not published | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentTechnologyCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not published | <1 minute for 90% of incidents (self-reported claim) |
| MTTR | Not published | 30 minutes for 90%+ of incidents (self-reported, no independent validation) |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | High scores on review platforms but from very small sample sizes. Praised for competitive pricing, all-inclusive model, and responsive support. Criticized for buggy portal and small company size. Zero Reddit presence and no G2 listing, which limits independent validation. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001PCI DSSGDPR |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001PCI DSS |
| Founded | 2020 | 2015 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | Not publicly disclosed |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and LMNTRIX?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). LMNTRIX is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for LMNTRIX.
How do Defendable and LMNTRIX differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. LMNTRIX supports 5 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Defendable and included with LMNTRIX.
How does Defendable pricing compare to LMNTRIX?
Defendable pricing: Not published. LMNTRIX pricing: Not officially published. One PeerSpot reviewer reported under $20/user/year. Claims to be priced lower than competitors' licensing alone.. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with LMNTRIX: Channel-only: cannot buy direct, must go through an MSSP partner, which may add margin or limit negotiation; Small company with no outside funding. Ask about business continuity plans and what happens if the company is acquired or shuts down..
Should I choose Defendable or LMNTRIX?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose LMNTRIX if: cost-conscious mid-market teams that want one platform covering endpoint, network, cloud, and identity without add-on fees. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. LMNTRIX is not ideal for risk-averse enterprise buyers who need vendor scale, financial backing, or third-party validated detection metrics.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.