Defendable vs Intezer
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Intezer is a AI-native MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Intezer serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 3 for Intezer (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity).
Buyer brief
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Intezer is a AI-native MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Intezer serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 3 for Intezer (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity).
Defendable (Services firm) and Intezer (AI-native MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Defendable's defendable mdr fits nordic buyers that want norwegian soc monitoring, microsoft sentinel-friendly... or Intezer's ai-first approach to soc operations delivers sub-minute triage across all alerts.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | Teams drowning in alert volume who need AI to autonomously triage 100% of alerts, not just aggregate them |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 5/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Teams drowning in alert volume who need AI to autonomously triage 100% of alerts, not just aggregate them
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | IntezerTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | CrowdStrikeSentinelOnePalo Alto Cortex XDR Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | SplunkElasticDevoSumo LogicWazuh Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Guided Response |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published. Contact sales for pricing. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Per-endpoint pricing with two tiers: Starter (one alert source) and Complete (unlimited alert sources). Pricing remains fixed regardless of alert volume increases. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | No breach warranty offered, unlike CrowdStrike ($2M) or Arctic Wolf ($3M). Starter tier limited to one alert source. Covering endpoint, SIEM, cloud and identity requires the Complete tier.. Managed SIEM and premium SLA support are paid add-ons on top of the base subscription. Full incident response not included. You get triage and guided remediation, not hands-on response. CarbonHelix 24/7 SOC is a separate engagement. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Annual |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalSlack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | North AmericaEurope |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | Minutes to connect alert sources via API |
| Industry focus | Not published | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailHospitalityLogistics |
| MTTD | Not published | Sub-minute (median under 60 seconds) |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | Users praise the intuitive UI, fast integration and detailed forensic analysis. Limited review volume compared to larger MDR vendors. Main concerns center on pricing transparency and the fact that escalated alerts go to your team, not Intezer analysts. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | SOC 2 Type II |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | SOC 2 Type II |
| Founded | 2020 | 2015 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | Not published |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and Intezer?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Intezer is an AI-native MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for Intezer.
How do Defendable and Intezer differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Intezer supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does Defendable pricing compare to Intezer?
Defendable pricing: Not published. Intezer pricing: Not published. Contact sales for pricing.. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with Intezer: No breach warranty offered, unlike CrowdStrike ($2M) or Arctic Wolf ($3M); Starter tier limited to one alert source. Covering endpoint, SIEM, cloud and identity requires the Complete tier..
Should I choose Defendable or Intezer?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose Intezer if: teams drowning in alert volume who need AI to autonomously triage 100% of alerts, not just aggregate them. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. Intezer is not ideal for organizations requiring traditional human-led MDR with dedicated analysts for every escalation.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.