Defendable vs DTS Solution
Defendable and DTS Solution are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while DTS Solution serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 3 for DTS Solution (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Buyer brief
Defendable and DTS Solution are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while DTS Solution serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 3 for DTS Solution (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
DTS Solution offers broader coverage (3 surfaces vs. 1). Defendable may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | Middle East and EMEA buyers that want a UAE-based managed CSOC and XDR provider |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Middle East and EMEA buyers that want a UAE-based managed CSOC and XDR provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | DTS SolutionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | CrowdStrikeMicrosoft endpoint securityHawkEye XDR AgentCustomer endpoint security tools |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | HawkEye NG-SIEMHawkEye Open XDRCustomer-owned SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateContainCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Tiered subscription packages by log-source count and EPS, with custom-tailored packages for additional log sources, EPS and retention. Public prices are not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | Package limits are defined by log sources and events per second, so high-volume environments should model ingestion growth before contract.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, contractual SLAs, service credits or MTTD/MTTR metrics.. DFIR is included only in Premium Platinum in the package table; lower tiers list it as an add-on.. Managed SOAR and many adjacent managed services are add-ons rather than guaranteed base MDR scope.. The public AI SOC page says response actions are analyst-approved, so buyers should document which containment actions DTS can execute and whose approval is required. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Lite Bronze, Baseline Silver, Advanced Gold, Premium Platinum, Custom-tailored package |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | MEA |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | HawkEye describes an onsite discovery workshop, package selection, secure onboarding, service delivery and secure offboarding. No standard calendar timeline was found. |
| Industry focus | Not published | Critical InfrastructureEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingGovernmentFinancial ServicesHealthcareRetailTechnologyTelecommunicationsSmart CitiesTransportation |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | HawkEye has strong vendor-controlled detail for package tiers, dashboard access, retention, CSOC/XDR capabilities and regional SOC positioning, but little independent MDR-specific review signal in public English-language communities. Buyers should validate analyst quality, response authority and pricing through references. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 45001SOC 2 Type IMITRE ATT&CK |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 45001SOC 2 Type I logo shown on DTS siteSOC-CMM risk-driven certification logo shown on DTS siteSWIFT CSP logo shown on DTS site |
| Founded | 2020 | 2011 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | HawkEye package pages publish 3 months hot storage, 6 months warm storage and 12 months cold storage across service tiers, with longer retention available through a custom-tailored package. Advanced and Premium tier pages also describe standard collected-log retention; buyers should reconcile final retention language in the contract. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and DTS Solution?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). DTS Solution is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for DTS Solution.
How do Defendable and DTS Solution differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. DTS Solution supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable.
How does Defendable pricing compare to DTS Solution?
Defendable pricing: Not published. DTS Solution pricing: Not published. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with DTS Solution: Package limits are defined by log sources and events per second, so high-volume environments should model ingestion growth before contract.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, contractual SLAs, service credits or MTTD/MTTR metrics..
Should I choose Defendable or DTS Solution?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose DTS Solution if: middle East and EMEA buyers that want a UAE-based managed CSOC and XDR provider. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. DTS Solution is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual MTTD/MTTR before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.