Defendable vs DefenseStorm
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. DefenseStorm is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; DefenseStorm serves SMB and Mid-market. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for DefenseStorm (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. DefenseStorm is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Defendable targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; DefenseStorm serves SMB and Mid-market. Defendable includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for DefenseStorm (Endpoint, Network).
Defendable (Services firm) and DefenseStorm (Platform vendor) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Defendable's defendable mdr fits nordic buyers that want norwegian soc monitoring, microsoft sentinel-friendly... or DefenseStorm's defensestorm is a strong vertical mdr candidate for u.s.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik | U.S. community banks, regional banks and credit unions that need MDR plus examiner-ready evidence |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 0/6 actions · Approval required |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- U.S. community banks, regional banks and credit unions that need MDR plus examiner-ready evidence
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC | DefenseStormTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | CrowdStrikeCarbon BlackOther EDR options supported through customer-specific integration Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | GRID ActiveCustomer security logs and event sources |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Guided Response |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Approval Required |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Alert and notify only |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. | Predictable employee-count-based pricing with unlimited data ingestion, according to current vendor homepage copy. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. | DefenseStorm is built exclusively for U.S. banks and credit unions, so it is a poor fit outside that vertical.. Response is collaborative/guided: the customer makes final decisions on actions in the environment.. No public contractual SLA table or service-credit terms were found despite published performance metrics.. Pricing varies by institution size, coverage tier and product mix, but no public price bands or minimums are disclosed. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Incident Response Retainer | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | |
| Onboarding | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. | G2 lists average time to implement as 1 month. Vendor site does not publish a standard MDR onboarding SLA. |
| Industry focus | Not published | Financial ServicesBankingCredit Unions |
| MTTD | Not published | <15 minutes mean time to detect across the customer base (vendor-reported) |
| MTTR | Not published | <24 hours mean time to respond (vendor-reported) |
| Community view | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. | G2 shows 4.8/5 across 29 reviews, with reviewers concentrated in banking and financial services and G2 category filters including MDR and EDR. Review themes are positive around customer support, team quality, onboarding and ease of use. Negative themes include querying/log complexity, asset discovery and navigation/reporting friction. Public Reddit signal was not meaningful in this pass. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response | FFIECGLBANCUANIST CSFCRI Profile |
| Certifications | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified | – |
| Founded | 2020 | 2014 |
| Data retention | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. DefenseStorm publishes GRID Active self-service restore/data retention content, but public retention terms were not found. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Defendable and DefenseStorm?
Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). DefenseStorm is a Platform vendor that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for DefenseStorm.
How do Defendable and DefenseStorm differ in response capabilities?
Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. DefenseStorm supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting.
How does Defendable pricing compare to DefenseStorm?
Defendable pricing: Not published. DefenseStorm pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found.. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Watch for with DefenseStorm: DefenseStorm is built exclusively for U.S. banks and credit unions, so it is a poor fit outside that vertical.; Response is collaborative/guided: the customer makes final decisions on actions in the environment..
Should I choose Defendable or DefenseStorm?
Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Choose DefenseStorm if: u.S. community banks, regional banks and credit unions that need MDR plus examiner-ready evidence. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales. DefenseStorm is not ideal for organizations outside U.S. banks and credit unions.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.