DeepSeas vs Tesorion
DeepSeas is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. DeepSeas targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
DeepSeas is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. DeepSeas targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
DeepSeas (Pure-play MDR) and Tesorion (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize DeepSeas's technology-agnostic mdr with ot/ics coverage, which is rare in this market or Tesorion's tesorion mdr fits dutch buyers that want local mdr delivered through t-soc and backed by t-cert, ....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market and enterprise organizations with OT/ICS environments needing unified IT and OT threat monitoring | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise organizations with OT/ICS environments needing unified IT and OT threat monitoring
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DeepSeasTECH-AGNOSTIC | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrike FalconMicrosoft DefenderCarbon Black SentinelOne | Customer endpoint telemetry SentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | SplunkMicrosoft Sentinel | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size and coverage areas. No published pricing. 1-3 year contract terms. | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Pricing is opaque, no public pricing or seat minimums disclosed. Incident response (DFIR) is handled through external partners, not included in MDR. OT/ICS coverage may require Nozomi Networks licensing and separate scoping. CyberFusion SOC (dedicated infrastructure) is a separate, premium offering beyond base MDR+ | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year (1-3 years) | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North America | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | ManufacturingEnergy & UtilitiesCritical InfrastructureFinancial ServicesHealthcareTechnology | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Ranked #1 service-based MDR in the 2024 Frost Radar and listed in Gartner's top 40 MDR providers. Praised for OT/ICS coverage and working with existing tools. Very limited practitioner reviews on G2, PeerSpot, or Reddit. Most validation comes from analyst reports rather than user feedback. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | ISO 27001 (certified December 2024, audited by A-LIGN)Nozomi Networks MSSP Elite PartnerMicrosoft PartnerCrowdStrike Integration Partner | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2022 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Not published | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between DeepSeas and Tesorion?
DeepSeas is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do DeepSeas and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
DeepSeas supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does DeepSeas pricing compare to Tesorion?
DeepSeas pricing: Not published. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with DeepSeas: Pricing is opaque, no public pricing or seat minimums disclosed; Incident response (DFIR) is handled through external partners, not included in MDR. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose DeepSeas or Tesorion?
Choose DeepSeas if: mid-market and enterprise organizations with OT/ICS environments needing unified IT and OT threat monitoring. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. DeepSeas is not ideal for organizations wanting fully autonomous remediation without pre-approved runbooks. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.