DeepSeas vs Defendable
DeepSeas is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. DeepSeas targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Defendable serves Mid-market and Enterprise. DeepSeas includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network, OT/ICS), compared to 1 for Defendable (Endpoint).
Buyer brief
DeepSeas is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. DeepSeas targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Defendable serves Mid-market and Enterprise. DeepSeas includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network, OT/ICS), compared to 1 for Defendable (Endpoint).
DeepSeas (Pure-play MDR) and Defendable (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize DeepSeas's technology-agnostic mdr with ot/ics coverage, which is rare in this market or Defendable's defendable mdr fits nordic buyers that want norwegian soc monitoring, microsoft sentinel-friendly....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market and enterprise organizations with OT/ICS environments needing unified IT and OT threat monitoring | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise organizations with OT/ICS environments needing unified IT and OT threat monitoring
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | DeepSeasTECH-AGNOSTIC | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrike FalconSentinelOneCarbon Black Microsoft Defender | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Splunk Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size and coverage areas. No published pricing. 1-3 year contract terms. | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Pricing is opaque, no public pricing or seat minimums disclosed. Incident response (DFIR) is handled through external partners, not included in MDR. OT/ICS coverage may require Nozomi Networks licensing and separate scoping. CyberFusion SOC (dedicated infrastructure) is a separate, premium offering beyond base MDR+ | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year (1-3 years) | Custom, Incident Response Retainer |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North America | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. |
| Industry focus | ManufacturingEnergy & UtilitiesCritical InfrastructureFinancial ServicesHealthcareTechnology | Not published |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Ranked #1 service-based MDR in the 2024 Frost Radar and listed in Gartner's top 40 MDR providers. Praised for OT/ICS coverage and working with existing tools. Very limited practitioner reviews on G2, PeerSpot, or Reddit. Most validation comes from analyst reports rather than user feedback. | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response |
| Certifications | ISO 27001 (certified December 2024, audited by A-LIGN)Nozomi Networks MSSP Elite PartnerMicrosoft PartnerCrowdStrike Integration Partner | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified |
| Founded | 2022 | 2020 |
| Data retention | Not published | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between DeepSeas and Defendable?
DeepSeas is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). DeepSeas covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for Defendable.
How do DeepSeas and Defendable differ in response capabilities?
DeepSeas supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment) and approval is configurable. Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does DeepSeas pricing compare to Defendable?
DeepSeas pricing: Not published. Defendable pricing: Not published. Watch for with DeepSeas: Pricing is opaque, no public pricing or seat minimums disclosed; Incident response (DFIR) is handled through external partners, not included in MDR. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published..
Should I choose DeepSeas or Defendable?
Choose DeepSeas if: mid-market and enterprise organizations with OT/ICS environments needing unified IT and OT threat monitoring. Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. DeepSeas is not ideal for organizations wanting fully autonomous remediation without pre-approved runbooks. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.