Daylight Security vs ThreatDown
Daylight Security and ThreatDown are both Platform vendors. Daylight Security works with your existing tools and targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while ThreatDown requires its own security platform and serves SMB and Mid-market. Daylight Security includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity), compared to 1 for ThreatDown (Endpoint).
Buyer brief
Daylight Security and ThreatDown are both Platform vendors. Daylight Security works with your existing tools and targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while ThreatDown requires its own security platform and serves SMB and Mid-market. Daylight Security includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity), compared to 1 for ThreatDown (Endpoint).
ThreatDown is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Daylight Security is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market and enterprise buyers frustrated with alert fatigue from traditional MDR providers | SMBs and IT-constrained organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing |
| Price | Custom quote | $99/endpoint/yr |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise buyers frustrated with alert fatigue from traditional MDR providers
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- SMBs and IT-constrained organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing
- Price
- $99/endpoint/yr
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Daylight SecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC | ThreatDownPLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market |
| Sentiment | Positive | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeSentinelOneMicrosoft Defender for EndpointPalo Alto Cortex XDRVMware Carbon Black Cloud | ThreatDown EDR (native, required) |
| SIEM integrations | SplunkMicrosoft SentinelIBM QRadarCrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEMCoralogixDatadogElasticGoogle ChroniclePantherSumo Logic | Splunk Enterprise (log export)Microsoft Sentinel (log export)Google Chronicle (log export) |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Not coveredIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: Not coveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | IsolateKill processQuarantine |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | MDR at $99/endpoint/year (Elite) or $119/endpoint/year (Ultimate). Server: $129-179/year. Mobile: $10/device. |
| Minimum seats | None | 5 |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| Identity | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| Network | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | ≤15 minutes | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-user per-month subscription with contract term discounts | Per-endpoint, published pricing. Four bundles: Core ($69), Advanced ($79), Elite ($99, includes MDR), Ultimate ($119, MDR+DNS+Premium). Server: $129-179/year. Mobile: $10/device. 5-endpoint minimum. 10% discount for 2-year commitment. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No breach warranty offered. If warranty coverage matters for your risk calculus, this is a gap.. 36-month contracts offer deeper discounts but lock you into a company with under two years of operating history.. No FedRAMP authorization. Not a fit for federal workloads requiring FedRAMP. | Endpoint-only coverage, no cloud workload, SaaS, identity, or network monitoring. Platform-native lock-in, cannot BYO CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Defender. No dedicated analyst or account manager, pooled SOC model |
| Data portability | Partial | Limited |
| Contract terms | 12 months, 24 months, 36 months | Annual, 2-year (10% discount) |
| Channels | SlackTeamsEmailPortal | SlackTeamsPortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEurope | North America |
| Onboarding | Under 1 hour | Minutes after agent deployment |
| Industry focus | TechnologyFinancial ServicesProfessional Services | EducationGovernmentHealthcareManufacturingMSP/Channel |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Public Gartner Peer Insights pages show a 5.0 average for Daylight Security as of May 2026, but review volume is still light compared to established MDR vendors. Coverage on G2 and PeerSpot is thin, and Reddit presence is minimal. | G2 4.6/5 (1,074 reviews) with multiple Leader awards (Best ROI, Easiest to Use). Gartner Peer Insights 4.6/5 (904 reviews) for EDR, though MDR-specific reviews are fewer. MRG Effitas EPP Product of the Year 2025. IDC MarketScape 2024: Leader for endpoint security (Small Business). Praised for simplicity and price transparency. Main knock: endpoint-only with platform lock-in. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO/IEC 27001:2022 | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001 |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II (AICPA, 31 March 2025)ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (IQNET, 14 December 2025) | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001 |
| Founded | 2024 | 2008 |
| Data retention | 90 days, with optional agentic security data lake | Not publicly disclosed |
| API available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Daylight Security and ThreatDown?
Daylight Security is a Platform vendor that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ThreatDown is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SLA commitments differ: Daylight Security offers ≤15 minutes, ThreatDown offers Not disclosed. Daylight Security covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for ThreatDown.
How do Daylight Security and ThreatDown differ in response capabilities?
Daylight Security supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. ThreatDown supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, file quarantine, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Daylight Security and not included with ThreatDown.
How does Daylight Security pricing compare to ThreatDown?
Daylight Security pricing: Not published. ThreatDown pricing: MDR at $99/endpoint/year (Elite) or $119/endpoint/year (Ultimate). Server: $129-179/year. Mobile: $10/device. (5-seat minimum). Watch for with Daylight Security: No breach warranty offered. If warranty coverage matters for your risk calculus, this is a gap.; 36-month contracts offer deeper discounts but lock you into a company with under two years of operating history.. Watch for with ThreatDown: Endpoint-only coverage, no cloud workload, SaaS, identity, or network monitoring; Platform-native lock-in, cannot BYO CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Defender.
Should I choose Daylight Security or ThreatDown?
Choose Daylight Security if: mid-market and enterprise buyers frustrated with alert fatigue from traditional MDR providers. Choose ThreatDown if: sMBs and IT-constrained organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing. Daylight Security is not ideal for risk-averse organizations requiring a multi-year proven operational track record and broad independent review coverage. ThreatDown is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing multi-surface coverage (cloud, SaaS, identity, network).