Daylight Security vs GoSecure: MDR Comparison 2026
Detailed comparison of Daylight Security and GoSecure managed detection and response services. Compare response capabilities, SLA, coverage, integrations, and compliance.
Winner by Category
Response Level
Tie
Same level
SLA Speed
Daylight Security
Faster response time
Coverage Breadth
Tie
Same coverage
Integrations
Daylight Security
More integration options
Criteria
Next-generation agentic AI MDR from Unit 8200 veterans, delivering 90%+ alert reduction and sub-hour deployment. Represents the emerging 'Managed Agentic Security Services' category. Best for forward-thinking organizations willing to bet on AI-native approach.
Response Type
Active Remediation
Active Remediation
Approval Policy
Configurable
N/A
Auto-Isolate
✓
✗
Kill Process
✓
✗
IR Included
✓ Included
Separate
Response SLA
Not disclosed
15-minutes
24/7 Coverage
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Channels
SlackTeamsEmailPortal
N/A
Data Access
Full Query
N/A
Model
Per-user per-month subscription with contract term discounts
Not published
Price Range
$200/user/month (12-month); up to 67% savings on 36-month contracts
Not published
Minimum Seats
None
N/A
Threat Hunting
✓ Included
N/A
Overall
Positive
N/A
Summary
Very early stage with strong investor backing ($40M total from Craft Ventures, Bain Capital). Early customers report 90% alert reduction and 5x MTTR improvement. Founded by Unit 8200 veterans. Too new for broad community feedback.
N/A
Daylight Security vs GoSecure: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Daylight Security if:
- You need active remediation
- Not disclosed response time meets your needs
- You prefer technology agnostic solutions
- Your org size: Mid-market / Enterprise
Choose GoSecure if:
- You need active remediation
- 15-minutes response time meets your needs
- You prefer technology agnostic solutions
- Your org size: Mid-market / Enterprise
FAQ
What's the main difference between Daylight Security and GoSecure?
Key differences: response model (Active Remediation vs Active Remediation), SLA (Not disclosed vs 15-minutes), and approach (Technology Agnostic vs Technology Agnostic).