Cyrebro vs ThreatDown: MDR comparison 2026
Cyrebro and ThreatDown are both Platform vendors. Cyrebro works with your existing tools and targets SMB and Mid-market organizations, while ThreatDown requires its own security platform and serves SMB and Mid-market. Cyrebro includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network), compared to 1 for ThreatDown (Endpoint).
Key differences at a glance
Full comparison
Which should you choose?
Choose Cyrebro if:
- •SMBs and mid-market teams that want MDR layered on top of their existing EDR and cloud tools
- •Organizations that need fast onboarding (hours) and do not want to manage a SIEM themselves
- •MSPs looking for a white-label, multi-tenant SOC platform
- •You need Cloud and SaaS and Network coverage included in base pricing
Choose ThreatDown if:
- •SMBs and IT-constrained organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing
- •MSPs wanting channel-first MDR with OneView multi-tenant console and RMM integrations
- •Environments prioritizing ransomware protection with 7-day rollback capability
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Bottom line: ThreatDown is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Cyrebro is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between Cyrebro and ThreatDown?
Cyrebro is a Platform vendor that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ThreatDown is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Cyrebro covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for ThreatDown.
How do Cyrebro and ThreatDown differ in response capabilities?
Cyrebro supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. ThreatDown supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Cyrebro and not included with ThreatDown.
How does Cyrebro pricing compare to ThreatDown?
Cyrebro pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. ThreatDown pricing: MDR at $99/endpoint/year (Elite) or $119/endpoint/year (Ultimate). Server: $129-179/year. Mobile: $10/device. (5-seat minimum). Watch for with Cyrebro: No public pricing means you cannot benchmark against competitors without a sales call; Data ingestion volume into the Security Data Lake may drive cost increases as your environment grows. Watch for with ThreatDown: Endpoint-only coverage, no cloud workload, SaaS, identity, or network monitoring; Platform-native lock-in, cannot BYO CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Defender.
Should I choose Cyrebro or ThreatDown?
Choose Cyrebro if: sMBs and mid-market teams that want MDR layered on top of their existing EDR and cloud tools. Choose ThreatDown if: sMBs and IT-constrained organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing. Cyrebro is not ideal for buyers who need US-based SOC operations or follow-the-sun coverage across multiple regions. ThreatDown is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing multi-surface coverage (cloud, SaaS, identity, network).