Cynet vs Macnica
Cynet is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cynet targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Macnica serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cynet includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Macnica (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
Cynet is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cynet targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Macnica serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cynet includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Macnica (Endpoint, Network).
Cynet is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Macnica is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | SMB and mid-market organizations with small security teams wanting maximum coverage from a single platform | Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting |
| Price | $7-10/endpoint/mo | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Requires own platform | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- SMB and mid-market organizations with small security teams wanting maximum coverage from a single platform
- Price
- $7-10/endpoint/mo
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CynetPLATFORM | MacnicaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Requires their platform | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Cynet 360 | CrowdStrike FalconTrellix EDRCustomer EDR tools |
| SIEM integrations | Syslog export to external SIEM | Customer SIEM and log platforms |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | IsolateCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | $7-10/endpoint/month depending on tier. Elite is $7/endpoint/month (EPP+EDR+CyOps MDR). All-in-One is $10/endpoint/month (adds NDR, UEBA, Deception, SOAR, SSPM). Verified on cynet.com/packages. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | 20 | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Identity | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-endpoint monthly subscription with published pricing on website | Custom quote by monitored products and service scope. Public prices are not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | 20-endpoint minimum ($140/month floor for Elite, $200/month for All-in-One). 1-year auto-renewing contracts standard, combined with platform lock-in makes exit disruptive. Requires replacing existing EDR with Cynet agent, significant migration effort if already deployed on CrowdStrike/SentinelOne/Defender. DFIR not included. Full incident response is a separate paid engagement.. 90-day standard data retention. Longer retention requires exporting to an external SIEM at your own cost.. No breach warranty offered | Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR.. Incident response support can be separately priced depending on incident content.. CrowdStrike and Vectra AI services may have separate vendor platform licensing and support requirements.. Some support is Japanese-centric; overseas support may require separate consultation. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support service, Vectra AI monitoring service, Vectra AI MDR, Ticket consultation service, Custom security service engagement |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | APAC |
| Onboarding | Hours to days depending on environment size. Single lightweight agent. | Not published. Macnica describes creating a customer chart with environment diagrams, log retention status and contact flow before incident support. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareFinancial ServicesTechnology/SaaSProfessional ServicesManufacturing | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailManufacturingHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunications |
| MTTD | Sub-5 minutes (vendor-claimed internal benchmark, not independently validated) | Not published |
| MTTR | Sub-10 minutes (vendor-claimed internal benchmark, not independently validated) | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 4.7/5 (139+ reviews across markets), VoC Strong Performer for XDR 2025 and EPP 2026. PeerSpot 8.8/10 (97% recommend). Praised for all-in-one simplicity and transparent pricing. Not included in Gartner MQ or Forrester Wave, limiting enterprise credibility. Small company (~260-320 employees, $21M revenue in 2024) raises long-term viability questions. | Macnica has strong official evidence for Japan-focused SOC monitoring, CrowdStrike support and Vectra AI monitoring/MDR options, but limited independent MDR-specific public review signal in English. Buyers should validate exact scope, analyst ownership, response authority, language support and whether the service is Macnica-led or partner-delivered. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001 | – |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001ISO 27032 | – |
| Founded | 2015 | – |
| Data retention | 90 days standard. Syslog export to any external SIEM for extended retention. | Not published. Macnica references log retention status as part of customer chart preparation for incident support, but public pages do not publish default retention or export rights. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Cynet and Macnica?
Cynet is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Macnica is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cynet covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Macnica.
How do Cynet and Macnica differ in response capabilities?
Cynet supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Macnica supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable.
How does Cynet pricing compare to Macnica?
Cynet pricing: $7-10/endpoint/month depending on tier. Elite is $7/endpoint/month (EPP+EDR+CyOps MDR). All-in-One is $10/endpoint/month (adds NDR, UEBA, Deception, SOAR, SSPM). Verified on cynet.com/packages. (20-seat minimum). Macnica pricing: Not published. Watch for with Cynet: 20-endpoint minimum ($140/month floor for Elite, $200/month for All-in-One); 1-year auto-renewing contracts standard, combined with platform lock-in makes exit disruptive. Watch for with Macnica: Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR..
Should I choose Cynet or Macnica?
Choose Cynet if: sMB and mid-market organizations with small security teams wanting maximum coverage from a single platform. Choose Macnica if: japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting. Cynet is not ideal for large enterprises with existing CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Defender deployments since Cynet requires replacing your EDR. Macnica is not ideal for buyers that require public MDR pricing before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.