Cyderes vs Macnica
Cyderes is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyderes targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Macnica serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cyderes includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Macnica (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
Cyderes is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Macnica is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyderes targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Macnica serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cyderes includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Macnica (Endpoint, Network).
Cyderes (Pure-play MDR) and Macnica (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Cyderes's technology-agnostic mdr built on google chronicle with deep identity security integrations and th... or Macnica's macnica is strongest for japanese buyers that want a local security services partner for soc moni....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Google Cloud-heavy environments wanting deep Chronicle/Security Operations integration with MDR | Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Google Cloud-heavy environments wanting deep Chronicle/Security Operations integration with MDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CyderesTECH-AGNOSTIC | MacnicaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrikeSentinelOneMicrosoft DefenderCybereasonPalo Alto CortexMalwarebytes | CrowdStrike FalconTrellix EDRCustomer EDR tools |
| SIEM integrations | Google ChronicleMicrosoft SentinelSplunk | Customer SIEM and log platforms |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | IsolateCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not publicly disclosed. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Identity | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote-based, not publicly disclosed | Custom quote by monitored products and service scope. Public prices are not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No public pricing at all. Expect an enterprise sales process with no self-serve benchmarks.. Google Chronicle license may be billed separately depending on delivery model. Clarify before signing.. DFIR is always a separate retainer, not included in base MDR.. Identity-first approach may require upfront IAM assessment and remediation work before MDR is fully operational. | Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR.. Incident response support can be separately priced depending on incident content.. CrowdStrike and Vectra AI services may have separate vendor platform licensing and support requirements.. Some support is Japanese-centric; overseas support may require separate consultation. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support service, Vectra AI monitoring service, Vectra AI MDR, Ticket consultation service, Custom security service engagement |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | APAC |
| Onboarding | Varies by environment. One enterprise case study references a 6-month parallel migration. Smaller deployments likely faster, but no published timeline. | Not published. Macnica describes creating a customer chart with environment diagrams, log retention status and contact flow before incident support. |
| Industry focus | Healthcare & Life SciencesFinancial ServicesGaming & EntertainmentRetailLegal ServicesManufacturingPharmaceutical/Biotech | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailManufacturingHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunications |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 5.0/5 from a single review. No G2 or Capterra listings. PeerSpot ranks #41 in MDR with 0 collected reviews. Glassdoor 3.2/5. Virtually no independent customer validation despite analyst recognition. | Macnica has strong official evidence for Japan-focused SOC monitoring, CrowdStrike support and Vectra AI monitoring/MDR options, but limited independent MDR-specific public review signal in English. Buyers should validate exact scope, analyst ownership, response authority, language support and whether the service is Macnica-led or partner-delivered. |
| Compliance | SOC 2ISO 27001 | – |
| Certifications | SOC 2ISO 27001 | – |
| Founded | 2003 | – |
| Data retention | Data stored in Google Chronicle/BigQuery. Retention periods customizable per contract. Chronicle provides 12 months of hot data by default. | Not published. Macnica references log retention status as part of customer chart preparation for incident support, but public pages do not publish default retention or export rights. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Cyderes and Macnica?
Cyderes is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Macnica is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cyderes covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Macnica.
How do Cyderes and Macnica differ in response capabilities?
Cyderes supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Macnica supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable.
How does Cyderes pricing compare to Macnica?
Cyderes pricing: Not publicly disclosed.. Macnica pricing: Not published. Watch for with Cyderes: No public pricing at all. Expect an enterprise sales process with no self-serve benchmarks.; Google Chronicle license may be billed separately depending on delivery model. Clarify before signing.. Watch for with Macnica: Macnica publishes multiple related services, so buyers should document whether they are buying Macnica SOC Service, CrowdStrike monitoring support, Falcon Complete, Vectra AI MDR, or a custom combination.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, service credits, universal response SLAs, MTTD or MTTR..
Should I choose Cyderes or Macnica?
Choose Cyderes if: google Cloud-heavy environments wanting deep Chronicle/Security Operations integration with MDR. Choose Macnica if: japanese organizations that want local SOC monitoring and investigation reporting. Cyderes is not ideal for sMBs or buyers needing transparent, published pricing. Macnica is not ideal for buyers that require public MDR pricing before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.