Cyberoo vs Tesorion
Cyberoo is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyberoo targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cyberoo includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Cyberoo is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyberoo targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cyberoo includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Cyberoo (Pure-play MDR) and Tesorion (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Cyberoo's technology-agnostic mdr from the only italian gartner representative vendor, built for european m... or Tesorion's tesorion mdr fits dutch buyers that want local mdr delivered through t-soc and backed by t-cert, ....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European mid-market companies wanting a GDPR-native provider with local SOC coverage | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 4/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Own agent required | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European mid-market companies wanting a GDPR-native provider with local SOC coverage
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 4/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Own agent required
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CyberooTECH-AGNOSTIC | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Technology-agnostic: integrates with most major EDR platforms | SentinelOneCustomer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | Technology-agnostic: integrates with existing SIEM deployments | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size and integrated tools. Pricing model not publicly disclosed. SaaS delivery. | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No public pricing. You cannot compare costs without a sales call.. Cypeer Agent X deployment required on endpoints, adding rollout overhead to onboarding.. International expansion is recent (Spain 2024, Poland via partners). Support quality outside Italy may vary.. Detection rules and threat intel are proprietary. If you leave, none of it transfers.. IR is described as included, but scope is not documented. Clarify whether it covers full DFIR or just triage and escalation. | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | ManufacturingProfessional ServicesTechnologyHealthcareFinancial Services | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 4.6/5 (25 reviews). Named Gartner Representative Vendor for MDR in 2021, 2023, and 2024, the only Italian company among 40 vendors in the 2024 guide. Strong reputation in Italian mid-market. Very limited English-language community discussion, likely due to European-centric customer base. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | GDPR | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | GDPR Compliant | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2019 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Not published | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Cyberoo and Tesorion?
Cyberoo is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cyberoo covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Tesorion.
How do Cyberoo and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
Cyberoo supports 4 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, process termination) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Cyberoo and not included with Tesorion.
How does Cyberoo pricing compare to Tesorion?
Cyberoo pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with Cyberoo: No public pricing. You cannot compare costs without a sales call.; Cypeer Agent X deployment required on endpoints, adding rollout overhead to onboarding.. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose Cyberoo or Tesorion?
Choose Cyberoo if: european mid-market companies wanting a GDPR-native provider with local SOC coverage. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. Cyberoo is not ideal for global enterprises needing follow-the-sun SOC coverage outside Europe. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.