Cyberoo vs Defendable
Cyberoo is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyberoo targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Defendable serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cyberoo includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 1 for Defendable (Endpoint).
Buyer brief
Cyberoo is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Defendable is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Cyberoo targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; Defendable serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Cyberoo includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 1 for Defendable (Endpoint).
Cyberoo (Pure-play MDR) and Defendable (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Cyberoo's technology-agnostic mdr from the only italian gartner representative vendor, built for european m... or Defendable's defendable mdr fits nordic buyers that want norwegian soc monitoring, microsoft sentinel-friendly....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European mid-market companies wanting a GDPR-native provider with local SOC coverage | Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 4/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Own agent required | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European mid-market companies wanting a GDPR-native provider with local SOC coverage
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 4/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Own agent required
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CyberooTECH-AGNOSTIC | DefendableTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Technology-agnostic: integrates with most major EDR platforms | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Technology-agnostic: integrates with existing SIEM deployments | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size and integrated tools. Pricing model not publicly disclosed. SaaS delivery. | Custom quote. Defendable does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No public pricing. You cannot compare costs without a sales call.. Cypeer Agent X deployment required on endpoints, adding rollout overhead to onboarding.. International expansion is recent (Spain 2024, Poland via partners). Support quality outside Italy may vary.. Detection rules and threat intel are proprietary. If you leave, none of it transfers.. IR is described as included, but scope is not documented. Clarify whether it covers full DFIR or just triage and escalation. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published.. Log storage can sit in the customer's Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or Defendable's platform, so retention and storage costs should be modeled early.. Incident-response retainer SLA is separate language and should not be assumed to be the MDR SLA.. Threat hunting is public, but hunt cadence and staffing are not published. |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom, Incident Response Retainer |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published | Defendable publishes an MDR onboarding flow covering identification, planning, platform establishment and execution. It does not publish a standard onboarding duration. |
| Industry focus | ManufacturingProfessional ServicesTechnologyHealthcareFinancial Services | Not published |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 4.6/5 (25 reviews). Named Gartner Representative Vendor for MDR in 2021, 2023, and 2024, the only Italian company among 40 vendors in the 2024 guide. Strong reputation in Italian mid-market. Very limited English-language community discussion, likely due to European-centric customer base. | Defendable has limited MDR-specific public review volume in major English-language review communities. The public buyer case rests on Norwegian SOC delivery, a direct MDR page, Microsoft Sentinel support, proactive threat hunting, a customer portal and incident-response depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, retention cost and contractual SLA terms directly. |
| Compliance | GDPR | ISO 27001Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident Response |
| Certifications | GDPR Compliant | ISO 27001:2023Norwegian National Security Authority Quality Scheme for Incident ResponseEco-lighthouse certified |
| Founded | 2019 | 2020 |
| Data retention | Not published | Defendable says customers can store additional log data in their own Microsoft Log Analytics tenant or in Defendable's log management platform. It does not publish standard MDR retention periods. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Cyberoo and Defendable?
Cyberoo is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Defendable is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cyberoo covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for Defendable.
How do Cyberoo and Defendable differ in response capabilities?
Cyberoo supports 4 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, process termination) and approval is configurable. Defendable supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Cyberoo and not included with Defendable.
How does Cyberoo pricing compare to Defendable?
Cyberoo pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Defendable pricing: Not published. Watch for with Cyberoo: No public pricing. You cannot compare costs without a sales call.; Cypeer Agent X deployment required on endpoints, adding rollout overhead to onboarding.. Watch for with Defendable: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Response authority should be defined in writing because named autonomous endpoint and identity actions are not published..
Should I choose Cyberoo or Defendable?
Choose Cyberoo if: european mid-market companies wanting a GDPR-native provider with local SOC coverage. Choose Defendable if: norwegian and Nordic buyers that want MDR operated from Oslo and Gjovik. Cyberoo is not ideal for global enterprises needing follow-the-sun SOC coverage outside Europe. Defendable is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual SLA terms before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.