CyberMaxx vs Performanta
CyberMaxx is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. CyberMaxx targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise. CyberMaxx includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for Performanta (Endpoint, Identity).
Buyer brief
CyberMaxx is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. CyberMaxx targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise. CyberMaxx includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for Performanta (Endpoint, Identity).
CyberMaxx (Pure-play MDR) and Performanta (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize CyberMaxx's healthcare-focused mdr with a zero-latency response model and 24x7x365 threat responders or Performanta's performanta fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mdr with safe xdr, managed soc and incident-....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR with genuine vertical expertise | Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR with genuine vertical expertise
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CyberMaxxTECH-AGNOSTIC | PerformantaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrike FalconSentinelOne Microsoft Defender | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | SplunkElasticExabeamDevoLevelBlueCustomer-provided SIEM | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Isolate | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Identity | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Three-tier pricing structure (Core, Advanced, Elite). Pricing varies by tier, environment size, EDR platform choice, and SIEM deployment model (managed vs. co-managed). Custom quotes based on coverage scope. | Custom quote. Performanta does not publish MDR, Safe XDR or managed SOC package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Incident response is NOT included. DFIR is a separate retainer. Ask for the actual retainer cost during a sales call.. Threat hunting is a separate Cyber Resiliency Service, not included in base MaxxMDR despite being mentioned on the MDR landing page.. EDR platform licenses (CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Microsoft Defender) are required and not included in the MDR price.. Core tier only covers endpoints OR cloud email, not both. Advanced required for combined coverage.. Three acquisitions in two years. Ask how consolidated the tooling and SOC operations actually are today. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Public pages do not define default MDR response authority, so buyers need the managed-technology boundary in writing.. Cloud and SaaS coverage appear tied to Microsoft security controls and Safe XDR scope, so non-Microsoft telemetry should be confirmed early.. Incident response is listed as a consulting service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom, Managed SOC, Safe XDR, MDR for Defender for Endpoint |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | EuropeAfrica |
| Onboarding | Under two months for full MDR ramp-up | Not published. Performanta describes scoping, discovery, prioritisation, validation and mobilisation stages for Safe XDR, but no standard implementation duration was found. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareFinancial ServicesState and Local GovernmentEducation | Financial ServicesEducationHealthcareGovernmentRetailProfessional ServicesAgricultureTelecommunicationsManufacturingTransportationTourism |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 4.7/5 (15 reviews in MDR category). MSSP Alert Top 250 provider (Top 50 in 2023). Small review sample compared to peers like Arctic Wolf (451+ reviews) or Expel (142 reviews). Praised for customer support and healthcare expertise. Almost no Reddit or G2 discussion. Three acquisitions in two years (CipherTechs 2023, Cybersafe and onShore Security Jan 2025) suggest rapid growth but integration risk is real. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Performanta's Microsoft security focus, UK and South Africa SOC operations, Safe XDR platform, threat-hunting process and incident-response consulting depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, non-Microsoft telemetry support and exact incident-response inclusion directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIHIPAA-aligned services | – |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II (audited by Insyte CPAs, LLC) | – |
| Founded | 2002 | 2010 |
| Data retention | Not published. Varies by SIEM platform and customer contract. | Not published. Performanta says it monitors customer environments and SIEM platforms, but no standard public MDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between CyberMaxx and Performanta?
CyberMaxx is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Performanta is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). CyberMaxx covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Performanta.
How do CyberMaxx and Performanta differ in response capabilities?
CyberMaxx supports 1 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable. Performanta supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does CyberMaxx pricing compare to Performanta?
CyberMaxx pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Performanta pricing: Not published. Watch for with CyberMaxx: Incident response is NOT included. DFIR is a separate retainer. Ask for the actual retainer cost during a sales call.; Threat hunting is a separate Cyber Resiliency Service, not included in base MaxxMDR despite being mentioned on the MDR landing page.. Watch for with Performanta: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost..
Should I choose CyberMaxx or Performanta?
Choose CyberMaxx if: healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR with genuine vertical expertise. Choose Performanta if: buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response. CyberMaxx is not ideal for buyers who need published MTTD/MTTR metrics or MITRE-validated detection to satisfy internal stakeholders. Performanta is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.