CyberMaxx vs Devoteam
CyberMaxx is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Devoteam is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. CyberMaxx targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Devoteam serves Mid-market and Enterprise. CyberMaxx includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for Devoteam (Cloud, Identity).
Buyer brief
CyberMaxx is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Devoteam is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. CyberMaxx targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Devoteam serves Mid-market and Enterprise. CyberMaxx includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 2 for Devoteam (Cloud, Identity).
CyberMaxx (Pure-play MDR) and Devoteam (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize CyberMaxx's healthcare-focused mdr with a zero-latency response model and 24x7x365 threat responders or Devoteam's devoteam cloud mdr is strongest for cloud-first organizations that want sentinel-centered siem op....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR with genuine vertical expertise | European and EMEA buyers that want a cloud-focused MDR from a multi-cloud services firm |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR with genuine vertical expertise
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- European and EMEA buyers that want a cloud-focused MDR from a multi-cloud services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CyberMaxxTECH-AGNOSTIC | DevoteamTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrike FalconSentinelOneMicrosoft Defender | Microsoft security toolsCustomer endpoint security tools |
| SIEM integrations | SplunkElasticExabeamDevoLevelBlueCustomer-provided SIEM | Microsoft SentinelCustomer SIEM platformsGoogle Security Operations |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Isolate | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Three-tier pricing structure (Core, Advanced, Elite). Pricing varies by tier, environment size, EDR platform choice, and SIEM deployment model (managed vs. co-managed). Custom quotes based on coverage scope. | Custom quote for cloud managed services and managed security. Public MDR prices are not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Incident response is NOT included. DFIR is a separate retainer. Ask for the actual retainer cost during a sales call.. Threat hunting is a separate Cyber Resiliency Service, not included in base MaxxMDR despite being mentioned on the MDR landing page.. EDR platform licenses (CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Microsoft Defender) are required and not included in the MDR price.. Core tier only covers endpoints OR cloud email, not both. Advanced required for combined coverage.. Three acquisitions in two years. Ask how consolidated the tooling and SOC operations actually are today. | Devoteam MDR is described as outsourced SIEM platform operations, so buyers should model Sentinel and cloud log ingestion before contracting.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits, SOC locations or formal MDR SLAs.. The service is cloud-centered; teams seeking a packaged endpoint MDR with named containment actions should validate endpoint tooling and response scope.. Devoteam has separate cloud, cybersecurity, Microsoft, AWS and Google Cloud offerings, so scope boundaries between MDR, cloud managed services and advisory work should be written into the contract.. Offboarding terms for SIEM detections, automation scripts, reports and retained logs are not described publicly. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom cloud managed services engagement, Managed Security, Cloud Managed Services, Managed Detection and Response |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | EuropeMEA |
| Onboarding | Under two months for full MDR ramp-up | Not published. Devoteam describes SIEM platform design and implementation, Infrastructure as Code deployment and managed cloud/security operations, but no standard MDR onboarding timeline. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareFinancial ServicesState and Local GovernmentEducation | TechnologyFinancial ServicesRetailTelecommunicationsManufacturingPublic SectorHealthcare |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 4.7/5 (15 reviews in MDR category). MSSP Alert Top 250 provider (Top 50 in 2023). Small review sample compared to peers like Arctic Wolf (451+ reviews) or Expel (142 reviews). Praised for customer support and healthcare expertise. Almost no Reddit or G2 discussion. Three acquisitions in two years (CipherTechs 2023, Cybersafe and onShore Security Jan 2025) suggest rapid growth but integration risk is real. | Devoteam has solid vendor-controlled evidence for cloud MDR, 24x7 monitoring, Sentinel-centered SIEM operations, SOAR automation and multi-cloud security partnerships. Independent MDR-specific buyer reviews are limited, so buyers should validate SOC delivery quality, response authority, cloud log costs and actual managed-service boundaries through references. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIHIPAA-aligned services | GDPRPCI DSSANSSICloud Security AllianceISO |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II (audited by Insyte CPAs, LLC) | AWS Premier Consulting PartnerAWS Managed Services ProviderGoogle Cloud Diamond PartnerGoogle Cloud Managed Services PartnerGoogle Cloud Managed Security Services PartnerGoogle Cloud Security Services Specialized partnerMicrosoft Solutions Partner for SecurityMicrosoft Azure Expert MSP |
| Founded | 2002 | – |
| Data retention | Not published. Varies by SIEM platform and customer contract. | Not published for MDR. Devoteam describes outsourced SIEM platform operations and cloud-managed services, but public pages do not publish default log retention, hot/warm storage or export terms. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between CyberMaxx and Devoteam?
CyberMaxx is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Devoteam is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). CyberMaxx covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Devoteam.
How do CyberMaxx and Devoteam differ in response capabilities?
CyberMaxx supports 1 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable. Devoteam supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does CyberMaxx pricing compare to Devoteam?
CyberMaxx pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Devoteam pricing: Not published. Watch for with CyberMaxx: Incident response is NOT included. DFIR is a separate retainer. Ask for the actual retainer cost during a sales call.; Threat hunting is a separate Cyber Resiliency Service, not included in base MaxxMDR despite being mentioned on the MDR landing page.. Watch for with Devoteam: Devoteam MDR is described as outsourced SIEM platform operations, so buyers should model Sentinel and cloud log ingestion before contracting.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits, SOC locations or formal MDR SLAs..
Should I choose CyberMaxx or Devoteam?
Choose CyberMaxx if: healthcare organizations needing HIPAA-aligned MDR with genuine vertical expertise. Choose Devoteam if: european and EMEA buyers that want a cloud-focused MDR from a multi-cloud services firm. CyberMaxx is not ideal for buyers who need published MTTD/MTTR metrics or MITRE-validated detection to satisfy internal stakeholders. Devoteam is not ideal for buyers that require public per-endpoint MDR pricing before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.