CyberCX vs Performanta
CyberCX is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. CyberCX targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise. CyberCX includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Performanta (Endpoint, Identity).
Buyer brief
CyberCX is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. CyberCX targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise. CyberCX includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 2 for Performanta (Endpoint, Identity).
CyberCX (Microsoft-ecosystem) and Performanta (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize CyberCX's regional anz leader with 9 crest-accredited socs, ~1,400 security professionals, and microsoft ad... or Performanta's performanta fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mdr with safe xdr, managed soc and incident-....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | ANZ mid-market to enterprise organizations that need local data sovereignty and regional SOC coverage | Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Approval required | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- ANZ mid-market to enterprise organizations that need local data sovereignty and regional SOC coverage
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CyberCXTECH-AGNOSTIC | PerformantaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Azure SentinelSplunk | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size, Microsoft security modules monitored, and coverage scope. No public pricing available. | Custom quote. Performanta does not publish MDR, Safe XDR or managed SOC package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Microsoft Defender XDR and Azure Sentinel licenses are customer-purchased prerequisites, not included in the managed SOC fee. Microsoft security stack must be built, tuned, and configured to CyberCX standards before monitoring can begin, adding weeks to months of onboarding. No public pricing. Requires direct sales engagement to get any cost estimate. Accenture acquisition (closed Feb 2026) may change service models, pricing structures, or contract terms during integration | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Public pages do not define default MDR response authority, so buyers need the managed-technology boundary in writing.. Cloud and SaaS coverage appear tied to Microsoft security controls and Safe XDR scope, so non-Microsoft telemetry should be confirmed early.. Incident response is listed as a consulting service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | Custom, Managed SOC, Safe XDR, MDR for Defender for Endpoint |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Asia-PacificEurope | EuropeAfrica |
| Onboarding | Weeks to months. Requires expert build, tuning, and configuration of the Microsoft security stack before monitoring begins. | Not published. Performanta describes scoping, discovery, prioritisation, validation and mobilisation stages for Safe XDR, but no standard implementation duration was found. |
| Industry focus | GovernmentCritical InfrastructureFinancial ServicesHealthcareEducationTechnology | Financial ServicesEducationHealthcareGovernmentRetailProfessional ServicesAgricultureTelecommunicationsManufacturingTransportationTourism |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | CREST Level 2 accredited with strong ANZ presence, but almost no independent reviews on G2, PeerSpot, or Gartner Peer Insights. Known regionally for Microsoft expertise and DFIR capability (250+ breaches/year). The Accenture acquisition creates uncertainty around service continuity. Minimal discussion on Reddit or practitioner forums compared to global MDR providers. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Performanta's Microsoft security focus, UK and South Africa SOC operations, Safe XDR platform, threat-hunting process and incident-response consulting depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, non-Microsoft telemetry support and exact incident-response inclusion directly. |
| Compliance | CREST SOC Level 2ISO 27001GDPR supportDORA support | – |
| Certifications | CREST SOC Level 2Microsoft Advanced Specialization - Threat ProtectionMicrosoft Advanced Specialization - Identity and Access ManagementMicrosoft Advanced Specialization - Cloud Security | – |
| Founded | 2019 | 2010 |
| Data retention | Not published. Governed by customer's own Microsoft Sentinel retention settings. | Not published. Performanta says it monitors customer environments and SIEM platforms, but no standard public MDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between CyberCX and Performanta?
CyberCX is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Performanta is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). CyberCX covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Performanta.
How do CyberCX and Performanta differ in response capabilities?
CyberCX supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and requires approval before acting. Performanta supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with CyberCX and not included with Performanta.
How does CyberCX pricing compare to Performanta?
CyberCX pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Performanta pricing: Not published. Watch for with CyberCX: Microsoft Defender XDR and Azure Sentinel licenses are customer-purchased prerequisites, not included in the managed SOC fee; Microsoft security stack must be built, tuned, and configured to CyberCX standards before monitoring can begin, adding weeks to months of onboarding. Watch for with Performanta: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost..
Should I choose CyberCX or Performanta?
Choose CyberCX if: aNZ mid-market to enterprise organizations that need local data sovereignty and regional SOC coverage. Choose Performanta if: buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response. CyberCX is not ideal for organizations outside ANZ or UK that need global SOC coverage across North America, LATAM, or broader APAC. Performanta is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.