AhnLab vs CyberCX
AhnLab is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. CyberCX is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. AhnLab targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; CyberCX serves Mid-market and Enterprise. AhnLab includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for CyberCX (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
AhnLab is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. CyberCX is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. AhnLab targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; CyberCX serves Mid-market and Enterprise. AhnLab includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 5 for CyberCX (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
AhnLab is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. CyberCX is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | South Korean and APAC organizations that already run AhnLab V3, EPP and EDR | ANZ mid-market to enterprise organizations that need local data sovereignty and regional SOC coverage |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 3/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Approval required |
| Stack | Requires own platform | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- South Korean and APAC organizations that already run AhnLab V3, EPP and EDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- ANZ mid-market to enterprise organizations that need local data sovereignty and regional SOC coverage
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | AhnLabPLATFORM | CyberCXTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Requires their platform | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | AhnLab EDR | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Microsoft Azure SentinelSplunk |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Guided Response |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Approval Required |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContain | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Identity | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| Network | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Based on the number of AhnLab EDR agents installed. AhnLab says EDR Premium includes the EDR license fee and that service cost requires a separate inquiry. | Custom pricing based on environment size, Microsoft security modules monitored, and coverage scope. No public pricing available. |
| Hidden cost warnings | The service is tied to AhnLab's endpoint stack, so buyers with existing CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender or SentinelOne deployments should price migration and overlap.. AhnLab separates basic MDR from paid EDR Premium. Buyers should confirm which response actions are included in each tier.. Public materials do not disclose minimum seats, regional availability, SLA terms or retained-forensics scope.. Fuller cross-domain detection may require AhnLab XDR, TIP, MDS, cloud or CPS products outside endpoint MDR. | Microsoft Defender XDR and Azure Sentinel licenses are customer-purchased prerequisites, not included in the managed SOC fee. Microsoft security stack must be built, tuned, and configured to CyberCX standards before monitoring can begin, adding weeks to months of onboarding. No public pricing. Requires direct sales engagement to get any cost estimate. Accenture acquisition (closed Feb 2026) may change service models, pricing structures, or contract terms during integration |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Per EDR agent, Custom quote, EDR Premium paid tier | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhoneTeams |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | APAC | Asia-PacificEurope |
| Onboarding | Requires AhnLab V3, EPP and EDR plus external transmission of AhnLab EDR detection logs. Public materials do not publish a standard onboarding timeline. | Weeks to months. Requires expert build, tuning, and configuration of the Microsoft security stack before monitoring begins. |
| Industry focus | TechnologyFinancial ServicesManufacturingGovernmentHealthcare | GovernmentCritical InfrastructureFinancial ServicesHealthcareEducationTechnology |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | AhnLab has stronger public proof around endpoint products than around MDR delivery. English-language MDR-specific buyer reviews are sparse, so buyers should validate analyst quality, escalation process and regional support through references. | CREST Level 2 accredited with strong ANZ presence, but almost no independent reviews on G2, PeerSpot, or Gartner Peer Insights. Known regionally for Microsoft expertise and DFIR capability (250+ breaches/year). The Accenture acquisition creates uncertainty around service continuity. Minimal discussion on Reddit or practitioner forums compared to global MDR providers. |
| Compliance | MITRE ATT&CK evaluationsSE Labs Advanced Security Test | CREST SOC Level 2ISO 27001GDPR supportDORA support |
| Certifications | SE Labs AAA rating for AhnLab EPP/EDRMITRE ATT&CK Evaluations Round 7 participant | CREST SOC Level 2Microsoft Advanced Specialization - Threat ProtectionMicrosoft Advanced Specialization - Identity and Access ManagementMicrosoft Advanced Specialization - Cloud Security |
| Founded | 1995 | 2019 |
| Data retention | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. AhnLab EDR collects endpoint behavior, file, registry, network, process, system and Windows event-log data for analysis in EDR Analyzer. | Not published. Governed by customer's own Microsoft Sentinel retention settings. |
| API available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between AhnLab and CyberCX?
AhnLab is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). CyberCX is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). AhnLab covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for CyberCX.
How do AhnLab and CyberCX differ in response capabilities?
AhnLab supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. CyberCX supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and requires approval before acting. Incident response is not included with AhnLab and included with CyberCX.
How does AhnLab pricing compare to CyberCX?
AhnLab pricing: Not published. CyberCX pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with AhnLab: The service is tied to AhnLab's endpoint stack, so buyers with existing CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender or SentinelOne deployments should price migration and overlap.; AhnLab separates basic MDR from paid EDR Premium. Buyers should confirm which response actions are included in each tier.. Watch for with CyberCX: Microsoft Defender XDR and Azure Sentinel licenses are customer-purchased prerequisites, not included in the managed SOC fee; Microsoft security stack must be built, tuned, and configured to CyberCX standards before monitoring can begin, adding weeks to months of onboarding.
Should I choose AhnLab or CyberCX?
Choose AhnLab if: south Korean and APAC organizations that already run AhnLab V3, EPP and EDR. Choose CyberCX if: aNZ mid-market to enterprise organizations that need local data sovereignty and regional SOC coverage. AhnLab is not ideal for buyers that want MDR layered on top of existing CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender, SentinelOne or other endpoint tools. CyberCX is not ideal for organizations outside ANZ or UK that need global SOC coverage across North America, LATAM, or broader APAC.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.