CyberCX vs Macquarie Government
CyberCX is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Macquarie Government is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. CyberCX targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Macquarie Government serves Enterprise. CyberCX includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 3 for Macquarie Government (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Buyer brief
CyberCX is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Macquarie Government is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. CyberCX targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Macquarie Government serves Enterprise. CyberCX includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 3 for Macquarie Government (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
CyberCX (Microsoft-ecosystem) and Macquarie Government (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize CyberCX's regional anz leader with 9 crest-accredited socs, ~1,400 security professionals, and microsoft ad... or Macquarie Government's macquarie government is strongest for australian agencies that need sovereign socaas backed by lo....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | ANZ mid-market to enterprise organizations that need local data sovereignty and regional SOC coverage | Australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Approval required | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- ANZ mid-market to enterprise organizations that need local data sovereignty and regional SOC coverage
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CyberCXTECH-AGNOSTIC | Macquarie GovernmentTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Customer endpoint security toolsWorkstation logs |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Azure SentinelSplunk | Macquarie Government SIEMaaSSplunk EnterpriseCustomer SIEM platforms |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateContainCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size, Microsoft security modules monitored, and coverage scope. No public pricing available. | Custom government subscription and procurement model. SOCaaS, SIEMaaS and SASE pricing is not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Microsoft Defender XDR and Azure Sentinel licenses are customer-purchased prerequisites, not included in the managed SOC fee. Microsoft security stack must be built, tuned, and configured to CyberCX standards before monitoring can begin, adding weeks to months of onboarding. No public pricing. Requires direct sales engagement to get any cost estimate. Accenture acquisition (closed Feb 2026) may change service models, pricing structures, or contract terms during integration | The service is explicitly built for Australian Commonwealth and state government agencies, so private-sector and non-Australian buyers may not be eligible or may not fit the operating model.. Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits or formal MDR SLAs.. SOCaaS is closely tied to Macquarie Government SIEMaaS, Splunk, sovereign hosting, SASE and gateway services; model migration work if replacing the service later.. Buyers should document which automated response actions are allowed by default and which require agency approval.. Log retention, ingestion, secure cloud, SASE and CTI options can materially change the total contract scope. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual, Multi-year | SOCaaS subscription, SIEMaaS subscription, SASE for Government, Custom government procurement |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Asia-PacificEurope | APAC |
| Onboarding | Weeks to months. Requires expert build, tuning, and configuration of the Microsoft security stack before monitoring begins. | Not published. Macquarie Government describes customized playbooks aligned with agency security processes and integration with existing security systems. |
| Industry focus | GovernmentCritical InfrastructureFinancial ServicesHealthcareEducationTechnology | GovernmentDefensePublic SectorCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | CREST Level 2 accredited with strong ANZ presence, but almost no independent reviews on G2, PeerSpot, or Gartner Peer Insights. Known regionally for Microsoft expertise and DFIR capability (250+ breaches/year). The Accenture acquisition creates uncertainty around service continuity. Minimal discussion on Reddit or practitioner forums compared to global MDR providers. | Macquarie Government has strong vendor-controlled evidence for Australian government sovereignty, 24x7 SOC operations, SIEMaaS, threat intelligence and SASE integration, but little independent MDR-specific buyer-review signal in public communities. Government buyers should use procurement references to validate analyst quality, response authority, onboarding effort and Splunk/log-volume cost exposure. |
| Compliance | CREST SOC Level 2ISO 27001GDPR supportDORA support | Essential 8ISMIRAPASDACSCDISP |
| Certifications | CREST SOC Level 2Microsoft Advanced Specialization - Threat ProtectionMicrosoft Advanced Specialization - Identity and Access ManagementMicrosoft Advanced Specialization - Cloud Security | NV1-cleared specialistsIndustry Security Program memberAustralian Government Strategic certified data centresPROTECTED-level secure web gateway assessmentIRAP-aligned virtual services gateway language |
| Founded | 2019 | – |
| Data retention | Not published. Governed by customer's own Microsoft Sentinel retention settings. | SIEMaaS pages describe sovereign local hosting and storage of up to seven years of security and event information. Public pages do not publish default retention for SOCaaS contracts or export terms. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between CyberCX and Macquarie Government?
CyberCX is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Macquarie Government is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). CyberCX covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for Macquarie Government.
How do CyberCX and Macquarie Government differ in response capabilities?
CyberCX supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and requires approval before acting. Macquarie Government supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with CyberCX and not included with Macquarie Government.
How does CyberCX pricing compare to Macquarie Government?
CyberCX pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Macquarie Government pricing: Not published. Watch for with CyberCX: Microsoft Defender XDR and Azure Sentinel licenses are customer-purchased prerequisites, not included in the managed SOC fee; Microsoft security stack must be built, tuned, and configured to CyberCX standards before monitoring can begin, adding weeks to months of onboarding. Watch for with Macquarie Government: The service is explicitly built for Australian Commonwealth and state government agencies, so private-sector and non-Australian buyers may not be eligible or may not fit the operating model.; Public pages do not publish prices, minimum terms, MTTD/MTTR, service credits or formal MDR SLAs..
Should I choose CyberCX or Macquarie Government?
Choose CyberCX if: aNZ mid-market to enterprise organizations that need local data sovereignty and regional SOC coverage. Choose Macquarie Government if: australian Commonwealth and state agencies that require sovereign onshore SOCaaS and MDR. CyberCX is not ideal for organizations outside ANZ or UK that need global SOC coverage across North America, LATAM, or broader APAC. Macquarie Government is not ideal for private-sector or non-Australian buyers that do not need a government-specific sovereign provider.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.