Cipher vs Integrity360
Cipher and Integrity360 are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Cipher targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Integrity360 serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Cipher includes 0 attack surfaces in base pricing (), compared to 4 for Integrity360 (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network).
Buyer brief
Cipher and Integrity360 are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Cipher targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations, while Integrity360 serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Cipher includes 0 attack surfaces in base pricing (), compared to 4 for Integrity360 (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network).
Integrity360 offers broader coverage (4 surfaces vs. 0). Cipher may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools | European mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting a regionally operated MDR with SOCs in EU jurisdictions |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Approval required | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- European mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting a regionally operated MDR with SOCs in EU jurisdictions
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CipherTECH-AGNOSTIC | Integrity360TECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer EDR | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published. Custom quotes only. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Cipher does not publish xMDR package pricing. | Per-endpoint pricing. No SIEM ingestion fees. Custom quotes based on environment size. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Cipher says xMDR works with the existing technology stack, so buyers should confirm which tools are included in the quote and what integration work is extra.. Public pages do not publish response SLAs, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The site names EDR and IPS/IDS integration but does not publish named vendor integrations.. Response wording is broad, so buyers should document pre-approved actions before go-live. | Darktrace NDR integration requires separate Darktrace licensing, not included in MDR pricing. Technology-agnostic model means the customer must own their own EDR/XDR licenses separately. Extended log storage is an add-on, default retention period not published. The 1-hour response commitment requires a separate IR retainer purchase on top of the base MDR service |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, xMDR Services, xMDR Platform | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | Portal | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeLATAM | EuropeAfricaNorth America |
| Onboarding | Cipher advertises 20 days for full service activation, but buyers should confirm scope and contract timing. | Approximately 6 weeks for core MDR. Includes log source integration, detection rule tuning, and honeypot deployment. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareProfessional ServicesPayments | Financial ServicesHealthcareGovernmentInsuranceRetailTelecommunications |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Cipher's Prosegur ownership, xMDR Platform, 24/7 SOC claim, six-SOC footprint, portal access and existing-stack positioning. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and SOC delivery details directly. | Gartner Representative Vendor in 5 Market Guides and holds SOC 2 Type II, CREST, and ISO 27001 certifications. Virtually no customer reviews exist on G2, PeerSpot, or Gartner Peer Insights, making independent sentiment verification impossible. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001ISO 22301ISO 20000ISO 9001SOC 1SOC 2PCI DSSCREST | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 27018ISO 27701CREST CSIRCREST Penetration Testing |
| Certifications | ISO 27001ISO 22301ISO 20000ISO 9001SOC ISOC IIPCI QSAPCI ASVCRESTTF-CSIRTCIPHER-CSIRT RFC2350 | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 27018ISO 27701CREST Cyber Security Incident ResponseCREST Penetration TestingMicrosoft Solutions Partner for Security |
| Founded | – | 2005 |
| Data retention | Cipher says all platform information is online 24/7 and available from any device. No public standard MDR data-retention period was found. | Not published. Extended log storage available as add-on. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Cipher and Integrity360?
Cipher is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Integrity360 is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cipher covers 0 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Integrity360.
How do Cipher and Integrity360 differ in response capabilities?
Cipher supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. Integrity360 supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Cipher and included with Integrity360.
How does Cipher pricing compare to Integrity360?
Cipher pricing: Not published. Integrity360 pricing: Not published. Custom quotes only.. Watch for with Cipher: Cipher says xMDR works with the existing technology stack, so buyers should confirm which tools are included in the quote and what integration work is extra.; Public pages do not publish response SLAs, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Watch for with Integrity360: Darktrace NDR integration requires separate Darktrace licensing, not included in MDR pricing; Technology-agnostic model means the customer must own their own EDR/XDR licenses separately.
Should I choose Cipher or Integrity360?
Choose Cipher if: mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools. Choose Integrity360 if: european mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting a regionally operated MDR with SOCs in EU jurisdictions. Cipher is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Integrity360 is not ideal for organizations wanting a single-vendor platform where EDR and MDR come from the same provider.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.