Check Point vs Todyl
Check Point is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Todyl is a MSP-channel that requires its own security platform. Check Point targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Todyl serves SMB and Mid-market.
Buyer brief
Check Point is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Todyl is a MSP-channel that requires its own security platform. Check Point targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Todyl serves SMB and Mid-market.
Todyl is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Check Point is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Enterprises already running Check Point firewalls and infrastructure who want consolidated security management | MSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform |
| Price | Custom quote | Base platform from $250/mo; MXDR pricing unpublished |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Enterprises already running Check Point firewalls and infrastructure who want consolidated security management
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- MSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform
- Price
- Base platform from $250/mo; MXDR pricing unpublished
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Check PointTECH-AGNOSTIC | TodylPLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | Check Point Harmony Endpoint | Todyl Endpoint Security (native, required, Elastic-based) |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Todyl Cloud-Managed SIEM (native) |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom-quoted. Generally perceived as premium pricing relative to competitors. | Starting at $250/month (platform base). Per-tier and per-module pricing not published. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Per-user subscription with one-year and multi-year plans. Three tiers: MDR (endpoint and API monitoring), MDR 360 (adds identity protection, expanded integrations, XDR/XPR access), MXDR 360 (adds managed SIEM and data lake). | Three-tier packaging (Essentials, Advanced, Complete) launched September 2025. Platform subscription starting at $250/month. Per-tier pricing not published. |
| Hidden cost warnings | ATAM 360 (dedicated account management) is an additional subscription on top of MDR. Licensing complexity is a recurring PeerSpot complaint, plan for negotiation cycles. Identity protection and expanded integrations require the MDR 360 tier, not the base MDR tier. PeerSpot reviewers consistently flag Check Point licensing and support costs as higher than competitors | Platform-native lock-in, must adopt full Todyl stack, cannot BYO EDR/SIEM/SASE. $250/month starting price is the base, unclear what modules are included at that tier. EDR is Elastic-based, not Todyl proprietary, custom rules layer on top of Elastic |
| Data portability | Partial | Limited |
| Contract terms | 1 year, Multi-year | Annual |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | SlackTeamsPortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | North America |
| Onboarding | Integration via APIs and endpoint agents | Not publicly disclosed |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesGovernmentHealthcareTelecommunicationsManufacturingCritical InfrastructureRetail | MSP/ChannelHealthcareGovernmentEducationFinancial Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | PeerSpot rates Check Point Infinity 8.8/10 (platform-level, not MDR-specific). Premium pricing, licensing complexity, and technical support delays are persistent complaints across PeerSpot reviews. MDR-specific community feedback is minimal. Most reviews cover the Infinity platform broadly, not the MDR service layer. | G2 4.6/5 (93 reviews). Software Finder 4.9/5 (14 reviews). PeerSpot listed but minimal reviews. MSP press is positive about tool consolidation. Limited independent buyer validation compared to established MDR vendors. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPRHIPAAPCI DSS | SOC 2 (infrastructure providers, not Todyl directly)ISO 27001 (infrastructure providers, not Todyl directly) |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001 | – |
| Founded | 1993 | 2015 |
| Data retention | Not publicly disclosed. MXDR 360 tier includes a data lake for long-term retention and compliance. | Up to 5 years searchable SIEM storage (configurable by tier) |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Check Point and Todyl?
Check Point is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Todyl is a MSP-channel that is platform-native (requires their own security stack).
How do Check Point and Todyl differ in response capabilities?
Check Point supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Todyl supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Check Point and not included with Todyl.
How does Check Point pricing compare to Todyl?
Check Point pricing: Custom-quoted. Generally perceived as premium pricing relative to competitors.. Todyl pricing: Starting at $250/month (platform base). Per-tier and per-module pricing not published.. Watch for with Check Point: ATAM 360 (dedicated account management) is an additional subscription on top of MDR; Licensing complexity is a recurring PeerSpot complaint, plan for negotiation cycles. Watch for with Todyl: Platform-native lock-in, must adopt full Todyl stack, cannot BYO EDR/SIEM/SASE; $250/month starting price is the base, unclear what modules are included at that tier.
Should I choose Check Point or Todyl?
Choose Check Point if: enterprises already running Check Point firewalls and infrastructure who want consolidated security management. Choose Todyl if: mSPs wanting to consolidate EDR, SASE, SIEM, MDR, and GRC into one platform. Check Point is not ideal for budget-conscious buyers or SMBs who need predictable, transparent pricing. Todyl is not ideal for organizations with existing EDR/SIEM/SASE investments (requires full Todyl stack adoption).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.