Capgemini vs TrustNet GhostWatch
Capgemini and TrustNet GhostWatch are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations, while TrustNet GhostWatch serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 2 for TrustNet GhostWatch (Cloud, Network).
Buyer brief
Capgemini and TrustNet GhostWatch are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations, while TrustNet GhostWatch serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 2 for TrustNet GhostWatch (Cloud, Network).
Capgemini offers broader coverage (3 surfaces vs. 2). TrustNet GhostWatch may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation | SaaS and cloud-native teams that want managed security tied to SOC 2, ISO 27001 or similar audit work |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- SaaS and cloud-native teams that want managed security tied to SOC 2, ISO 27001 or similar audit work
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CapgeminiTECH-AGNOSTIC | TrustNet GhostWatchTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint security tools | None listed |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelCustomer SIEM platforms | GhostWatch integrated SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | ContainCustom playbooks | ContainCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom enterprise quote by service scope, technology stack, Cyber Defense Center model and transformation requirements. Public prices are not published. | Custom quote. TrustNet publishes flexible service tiers and says GhostWatch is available for an affordable fixed monthly fee, but no public managed-security price list was found. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.. Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Microsoft Sentinel-powered Cyber Defense Centers may require separate Microsoft licensing and data-ingestion planning.. Threat hunting, DFIR, vulnerability management and offensive security are all public offers, but buyers should confirm which are included in the base MDR scope versus separate workstreams.. Public materials do not disclose log retention, raw data export rights or detection-content portability. | TrustNet is compliance-heavy, so buyers should separate MDR and managed security operations cost from audit and advisory work.. Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named containment actions.. Endpoint coverage is less explicit than network, cloud, SIEM and vulnerability management coverage.. GhostWatch and TrustNet pages use both managed security and MDR language, so buyers should confirm exact service obligations in the order form. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Continuous Vigilance, Managed Detection and Response, Managed SOC, SOC Transformation, Cyber Defense Centers powered by Microsoft Sentinel, Custom cybersecurity services engagement | Custom, Monthly |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAPACLATAMMEA | North America |
| Onboarding | Not published. Capgemini positions the service as a custom enterprise engagement delivered through global Cyber Defense Centers. | TrustNet says GhostWatch begins monitoring immediately after rapid deployment, with assessment and alignment before onboarding. A public standard onboarding timeline was not found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingAutomotiveHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunicationsTechnology | SaaSHealthcareRetailFinancial ServicesTechnologyCompliance-heavy organizations |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Capgemini has strong official evidence for enterprise-scale cybersecurity, Continuous Vigilance, MDR, Managed SOC, global Cyber Defense Centers, DFIR and threat hunting, but limited public buyer-review signal for the MDR service as a distinct product. Diligence should focus on service scope, response authority, tooling, staffing model, retention and pricing. | GhostWatch has limited MDR-specific community signal. TrustNet's public story is strongest around compliance, audits, MDR and managed security rather than independent MDR benchmarks. Treat buyer diligence as a service-scope exercise: verify response authority, telemetry sources and the split between security operations and compliance services. |
| Compliance | DORA | SOC 2PCI DSSISO 27001HIPAAHITRUSTGDPRCCPACMMCNIST CSF |
| Certifications | – | PCI QSA |
| Founded | 1967 | 2003 |
| Data retention | Not published. Public Continuous Vigilance pages do not disclose default log retention, archive tiers or export rights. | Not published as a standard GhostWatch retention period. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Capgemini and TrustNet GhostWatch?
Capgemini is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). TrustNet GhostWatch is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Capgemini covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for TrustNet GhostWatch.
How do Capgemini and TrustNet GhostWatch differ in response capabilities?
Capgemini supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. TrustNet GhostWatch supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Capgemini and not included with TrustNet GhostWatch.
How does Capgemini pricing compare to TrustNet GhostWatch?
Capgemini pricing: Not published. TrustNet GhostWatch pricing: Not published. Watch for with Capgemini: Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.; Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Watch for with TrustNet GhostWatch: TrustNet is compliance-heavy, so buyers should separate MDR and managed security operations cost from audit and advisory work.; Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named containment actions..
Should I choose Capgemini or TrustNet GhostWatch?
Choose Capgemini if: large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation. Choose TrustNet GhostWatch if: saaS and cloud-native teams that want managed security tied to SOC 2, ISO 27001 or similar audit work. Capgemini is not ideal for sMBs seeking transparent per-endpoint MDR pricing. TrustNet GhostWatch is not ideal for buyers that need a pure-play MDR provider with published endpoint isolation and account containment actions.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.