Capgemini vs Tesorion
Capgemini and Tesorion are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations, while Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Capgemini and Tesorion are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Capgemini targets Enterprise organizations, while Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Capgemini includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Network), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Tesorion offers broader coverage (4 surfaces vs. 3). Capgemini may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Reports only | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | CapgeminiTECH-AGNOSTIC | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer endpoint security tools | SentinelOneCustomer endpoint telemetry |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelCustomer SIEM platforms | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | ContainCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom enterprise quote by service scope, technology stack, Cyber Defense Center model and transformation requirements. Public prices are not published. | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.. Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Microsoft Sentinel-powered Cyber Defense Centers may require separate Microsoft licensing and data-ingestion planning.. Threat hunting, DFIR, vulnerability management and offensive security are all public offers, but buyers should confirm which are included in the base MDR scope versus separate workstreams.. Public materials do not disclose log retention, raw data export rights or detection-content portability. | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Continuous Vigilance, Managed Detection and Response, Managed SOC, SOC Transformation, Cyber Defense Centers powered by Microsoft Sentinel, Custom cybersecurity services engagement | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhoneTeams | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAPACLATAMMEA | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published. Capgemini positions the service as a custom enterprise engagement delivered through global Cyber Defense Centers. | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEnergyUtilitiesManufacturingAutomotiveHealthcarePublic SectorTelecommunicationsTechnology | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Capgemini has strong official evidence for enterprise-scale cybersecurity, Continuous Vigilance, MDR, Managed SOC, global Cyber Defense Centers, DFIR and threat hunting, but limited public buyer-review signal for the MDR service as a distinct product. Diligence should focus on service scope, response authority, tooling, staffing model, retention and pricing. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | DORA | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | – | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 1967 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Not published. Public Continuous Vigilance pages do not disclose default log retention, archive tiers or export rights. | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Capgemini and Tesorion?
Capgemini is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Capgemini covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Tesorion.
How do Capgemini and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
Capgemini supports 2 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, network containment) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Capgemini and not included with Tesorion.
How does Capgemini pricing compare to Tesorion?
Capgemini pricing: Not published. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with Capgemini: Capgemini is a global services firm, so scope, tooling, response authority and transformation work should be specified precisely in the statement of work.; Public pages do not publish pricing, minimum terms, service credits, MTTD, MTTR or a contractual response SLA.. Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose Capgemini or Tesorion?
Choose Capgemini if: large enterprises that want a global services partner for MDR plus SOC transformation. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. Capgemini is not ideal for sMBs seeking transparent per-endpoint MDR pricing. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.