BlueVoyant vs NCC Group: MDR comparison 2026
BlueVoyant is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. NCC Group is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. BlueVoyant targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; NCC Group serves Mid-market and Enterprise. BlueVoyant includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 4 for NCC Group (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Network).
Key differences at a glance
Full comparison
Which should you choose?
Choose BlueVoyant if:
- •Organizations that want all detection rules, playbooks, and data to stay in their own SIEM instance
- •Splunk Enterprise or Splunk Cloud customers needing managed detection and response
Choose NCC Group if:
- •European enterprise and government organizations running Microsoft Sentinel or Splunk as their SIEM
- •Buyers wanting MDR from a provider with deep incident response and consulting capability in one firm
- •UK and Benelux organizations wanting a locally operated SOC with Dutch government security heritage
- •You need SaaS and Network coverage included in base pricing
- •Threat hunting included in base pricing (it's an add-on with BlueVoyant)
Bottom line: BlueVoyant (Pure-play MDR) and NCC Group (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize BlueVoyant's the strongest microsoft sentinel mdr option for organizations that want their detection rules, pl... or NCC Group's consultancy-backed mxdr with fox-it's 20+ year soc heritage and embedded ir team.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between BlueVoyant and NCC Group?
BlueVoyant is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). NCC Group is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). BlueVoyant covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for NCC Group.
How do BlueVoyant and NCC Group differ in response capabilities?
BlueVoyant supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. NCC Group supports 5 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with BlueVoyant and included with NCC Group.
How does BlueVoyant pricing compare to NCC Group?
BlueVoyant pricing: Not published. Contact for custom quote.. NCC Group pricing: Not published. Custom quotes only.. Watch for with BlueVoyant: Threat hunting is not included in base MDR. Advanced Threat Hunting and Cross Signal Hunting are add-on tiers with separate pricing; Coverage varies significantly by which MDR track you buy (Microsoft, Splunk, Cisco XDR, Endpoint). Identity and SaaS coverage may only be available in the Microsoft track. Watch for with NCC Group: MXDR for Microsoft and MXDR for Splunk are separate offerings. Customers using both Sentinel and Splunk may face separate engagements.; Only Microsoft Defender and CrowdStrike EDR integrations are confirmed. Other EDR platforms may not be supported..
Should I choose BlueVoyant or NCC Group?
Choose BlueVoyant if: mid-market and enterprise organizations already invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender wanting MDR without a proprietary agent. Choose NCC Group if: european enterprise and government organizations running Microsoft Sentinel or Splunk as their SIEM. BlueVoyant is not ideal for organizations needing broad multi-vendor integration support. BlueVoyant supports four EDR platforms and two SIEMs, far fewer than competitors like Expel or eSentire. NCC Group is not ideal for organizations running a SIEM other than Microsoft Sentinel or Splunk (only two supported).