BlueVoyant vs Ensign InfoSecurity
BlueVoyant is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. BlueVoyant targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Ensign InfoSecurity serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
BlueVoyant is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. BlueVoyant targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Ensign InfoSecurity serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
BlueVoyant (Pure-play MDR) and Ensign InfoSecurity (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize BlueVoyant's the strongest microsoft sentinel mdr option for organizations that want their detection rules, pl... or Ensign InfoSecurity's apac's largest pure-play cybersecurity services provider with socs in five countries, local langu....
At a glance
| FIELD | ||
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Organizations that want all detection rules, playbooks, and data to stay in their own SIEM instance | Mid-market and enterprise organizations operating primarily in APAC |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Approval required |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Organizations that want all detection rules, playbooks, and data to stay in their own SIEM instance
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise organizations operating primarily in APAC
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | BlueVoyantTECH-AGNOSTIC | Ensign InfoSecurityTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft DefenderCrowdStrikeSentinelOneCarbon Black | Cybereason |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelSplunk | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Guided Response |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Approval Required |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published. Contact for custom quote. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | + Optional |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Subscription-based, priced per endpoint for laptops, workstations, and servers. All log sources included in the per-endpoint price. Also available via AWS Marketplace and Azure Marketplace. | Custom pricing based on environment size and coverage scope. IR retainer is separate: Essentials (USD 2,000/year, 10 hours), Standard (100-hour blocks), or Ad-hoc. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Threat hunting is not included in base MDR. Advanced Threat Hunting and Cross Signal Hunting are add-on tiers with separate pricing. Coverage varies significantly by which MDR track you buy (Microsoft, Splunk, Cisco XDR, Endpoint). Identity and SaaS coverage may only be available in the Microsoft track. Very few public reviews (6 on Gartner, 0 on PeerSpot) make it hard to validate claims before buying. No published response time SLA. Ask for written commitments before signing | Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. Cheapest IR retainer (Essentials) is USD 2,000/year for just 10 manhours.. 8-hour on-site IR support is only for Singapore-based clients. Other APAC locations get remote support or longer SLAs.. Pricing requires custom quote. No published per-endpoint or per-user rates for comparison shopping.. Cybereason EDR is the default platform. Unclear what the cost or support impact is if you use a different EDR vendor.. Ad-hoc IR retainer has no upfront cost but standard-priced manhours and longer onboarding. You pay more per hour in a crisis. |
| Data portability | Full | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Annual |
| Channels | PortalEmail | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | Asia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Not published. Deployment involves configuring data connectors and playbooks within the customer's existing SIEM. | Not published |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesGovernmentDefense | Financial ServicesGovernmentHealthcareManufacturingTechnology |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published as an absolute figure. Forrester TEI study (Sep 2024) found 70% reduction in mean time to resolution for BlueVoyant MDR clients. | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 4.5/5 (6 reviews). Named in the 2025 Gartner Market Guide for MDR. Strong Microsoft credentials (Partner of the Year, 500+ Sentinel deployments). Very limited public review data makes independent validation difficult. | MSSP Alert Top 250: top 10 globally and #1 in APAC for the fourth consecutive year (2025 list). No G2 or PeerSpot product reviews found. Glassdoor employee reviews average 3.4/5 (268 reviews). Industry recognition is strong within APAC, but almost zero practitioner discussion outside the region. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | ISO 27001PCI DSS |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II (annual audit)Microsoft Worldwide Security Partner of the Year 2024Three-time Microsoft US Security Partner of the YearUK G-Cloud accreditedSplunk Premier Manage partner | ISO 27001PCI DSSOSPAR (SOC attestation) |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Data stays in customer's own SIEM instance. Retention governed by customer's Sentinel/Splunk configuration. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between BlueVoyant and Ensign InfoSecurity?
BlueVoyant is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Ensign InfoSecurity is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do BlueVoyant and Ensign InfoSecurity differ in response capabilities?
BlueVoyant supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Ensign InfoSecurity supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and requires approval before acting.
How does BlueVoyant pricing compare to Ensign InfoSecurity?
BlueVoyant pricing: Not published. Contact for custom quote.. Ensign InfoSecurity pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with BlueVoyant: Threat hunting is not included in base MDR. Advanced Threat Hunting and Cross Signal Hunting are add-on tiers with separate pricing; Coverage varies significantly by which MDR track you buy (Microsoft, Splunk, Cisco XDR, Endpoint). Identity and SaaS coverage may only be available in the Microsoft track. Watch for with Ensign InfoSecurity: Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. Cheapest IR retainer (Essentials) is USD 2,000/year for just 10 manhours.; 8-hour on-site IR support is only for Singapore-based clients. Other APAC locations get remote support or longer SLAs..
Should I choose BlueVoyant or Ensign InfoSecurity?
Choose BlueVoyant if: mid-market and enterprise organizations already invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender wanting MDR without a proprietary agent. Choose Ensign InfoSecurity if: mid-market and enterprise organizations operating primarily in APAC. BlueVoyant is not ideal for organizations needing broad multi-vendor integration support. BlueVoyant supports four EDR platforms and two SIEMs, far fewer than competitors like Expel or eSentire. Ensign InfoSecurity is not ideal for north American or European organizations without APAC operations.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.