BlueVoyant vs Cipher
BlueVoyant is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Cipher is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. BlueVoyant targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Cipher serves Mid-market and Enterprise. BlueVoyant includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 0 for Cipher ().
Buyer brief
BlueVoyant is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Cipher is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. BlueVoyant targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Cipher serves Mid-market and Enterprise. BlueVoyant includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 0 for Cipher ().
BlueVoyant (Pure-play MDR) and Cipher (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize BlueVoyant's the strongest microsoft sentinel mdr option for organizations that want their detection rules, pl... or Cipher's cipher xmdr fits buyers that want a vendor-neutral mdr service backed by prosegur and delivered t....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Organizations that want all detection rules, playbooks, and data to stay in their own SIEM instance | Mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 0/6 actions · Approval required |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Organizations that want all detection rules, playbooks, and data to stay in their own SIEM instance
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | BlueVoyantTECH-AGNOSTIC | CipherTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft DefenderCrowdStrikeSentinelOneCarbon Black | Customer EDR |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelSplunk | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Guided Response |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Approval Required |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Alert and notify only |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published. Contact for custom quote. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | Not offered |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | Not offered |
| Network | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Subscription-based, priced per endpoint for laptops, workstations, and servers. All log sources included in the per-endpoint price. Also available via AWS Marketplace and Azure Marketplace. | Custom quote. Cipher does not publish xMDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Threat hunting is not included in base MDR. Advanced Threat Hunting and Cross Signal Hunting are add-on tiers with separate pricing. Coverage varies significantly by which MDR track you buy (Microsoft, Splunk, Cisco XDR, Endpoint). Identity and SaaS coverage may only be available in the Microsoft track. Very few public reviews (6 on Gartner, 0 on PeerSpot) make it hard to validate claims before buying. No published response time SLA. Ask for written commitments before signing | Cipher says xMDR works with the existing technology stack, so buyers should confirm which tools are included in the quote and what integration work is extra.. Public pages do not publish response SLAs, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The site names EDR and IPS/IDS integration but does not publish named vendor integrations.. Response wording is broad, so buyers should document pre-approved actions before go-live. |
| Data portability | Full | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom, xMDR Services, xMDR Platform |
| Channels | PortalEmail | Portal |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | North AmericaEuropeLATAM |
| Onboarding | Not published. Deployment involves configuring data connectors and playbooks within the customer's existing SIEM. | Cipher advertises 20 days for full service activation, but buyers should confirm scope and contract timing. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesGovernmentDefense | HealthcareProfessional ServicesPayments |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published as an absolute figure. Forrester TEI study (Sep 2024) found 70% reduction in mean time to resolution for BlueVoyant MDR clients. | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 4.5/5 (6 reviews). Named in the 2025 Gartner Market Guide for MDR. Strong Microsoft credentials (Partner of the Year, 500+ Sentinel deployments). Very limited public review data makes independent validation difficult. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Cipher's Prosegur ownership, xMDR Platform, 24/7 SOC claim, six-SOC footprint, portal access and existing-stack positioning. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, named integrations and SOC delivery details directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | ISO 27001ISO 22301ISO 20000ISO 9001SOC 1SOC 2PCI DSSCREST |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II (annual audit)Microsoft Worldwide Security Partner of the Year 2024Three-time Microsoft US Security Partner of the YearUK G-Cloud accreditedSplunk Premier Manage partner | ISO 27001ISO 22301ISO 20000ISO 9001SOC ISOC IIPCI QSAPCI ASVCRESTTF-CSIRTCIPHER-CSIRT RFC2350 |
| Founded | 2017 | – |
| Data retention | Data stays in customer's own SIEM instance. Retention governed by customer's Sentinel/Splunk configuration. | Cipher says all platform information is online 24/7 and available from any device. No public standard MDR data-retention period was found. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between BlueVoyant and Cipher?
BlueVoyant is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Cipher is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). BlueVoyant covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 0 for Cipher.
How do BlueVoyant and Cipher differ in response capabilities?
BlueVoyant supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Cipher supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting.
How does BlueVoyant pricing compare to Cipher?
BlueVoyant pricing: Not published. Contact for custom quote.. Cipher pricing: Not published. Watch for with BlueVoyant: Threat hunting is not included in base MDR. Advanced Threat Hunting and Cross Signal Hunting are add-on tiers with separate pricing; Coverage varies significantly by which MDR track you buy (Microsoft, Splunk, Cisco XDR, Endpoint). Identity and SaaS coverage may only be available in the Microsoft track. Watch for with Cipher: Cipher says xMDR works with the existing technology stack, so buyers should confirm which tools are included in the quote and what integration work is extra.; Public pages do not publish response SLAs, contract minimums or service-credit language..
Should I choose BlueVoyant or Cipher?
Choose BlueVoyant if: mid-market and enterprise organizations already invested in Microsoft Sentinel and Defender wanting MDR without a proprietary agent. Choose Cipher if: mid-market and enterprise buyers that want a managed service layered over existing security tools. BlueVoyant is not ideal for organizations needing broad multi-vendor integration support. BlueVoyant supports four EDR platforms and two SIEMs, far fewer than competitors like Expel or eSentire. Cipher is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.