Bitdefender MDR vs Field Effect: MDR Comparison 2026
Bitdefender MDR (EDR vendor) and Field Effect (MDR provider) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Bitdefender MDR requires its own security platform, while Field Effect requires its own security platform. Bitdefender MDR targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Field Effect focuses on SMB and Mid-market.
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Bitdefender MDR vs Field Effect: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Bitdefender MDR if:
- •Mid-market organizations (50-200+ endpoints) wanting single-vendor MDR + EPP/EDR/XDR
- •Organizations already using or willing to adopt GravityZone
- •MSPs looking for affordable, multi-tenant MDR with consumption billing
Choose Field Effect if:
- •SMBs and MSPs wanting affordable, easy-to-deploy MDR with published per-user pricing
- •Canadian organizations needing domestic data hosting and PIPEDA compliance
- •Healthcare, government, and defense contractors needing HIPAA/CMMC/NIST compliance support
Bottom line: Bitdefender MDR (EDR vendor) and Field Effect (MDR provider) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Bitdefender MDR's mitre-validated detection quality (24-min mttd, lowest fp rate) on a single-vendor gravityzone pl... or Field Effect's mitre-validated detection (11-min mttd, detected every measured step) with vendor-claimed 99.9% n....
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Bitdefender MDR and Field Effect?
Bitdefender MDR is an EDR vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Field Effect is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SLA commitments differ: Bitdefender MDR offers ≤30 minutes, Field Effect offers Not disclosed.
How do Bitdefender MDR and Field Effect differ in response capabilities?
Bitdefender MDR supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Field Effect supports 5 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Bitdefender MDR and not included with Field Effect.
How does Bitdefender MDR pricing compare to Field Effect?
Bitdefender MDR pricing: MDR Core ~$6.99/endpoint/month, MDR Advanced ~$10.49/endpoint/month, MDR Enterprise ~$14.99/endpoint/month. MDR Foundations and MDR PLUS pricing not publicly disclosed.. Field Effect pricing: MDR Core: $99/user/month (ideal for <=25 users). MDR Complete: custom pricing (larger organizations, compliance requirements).. Watch for with Bitdefender MDR: Requires GravityZone agent — cannot use third-party EDR for core MDR detection; XDR sensor licenses (network, identity, cloud, email) are additional cost. Watch for with Field Effect: MDR Core excludes network monitoring, DNS firewall, and dark web monitoring — significant feature gap vs Complete; $99/user adds up quickly — 50 users = $4,950/month.
Should I choose Bitdefender MDR or Field Effect?
Choose Bitdefender MDR if: mid-market organizations (50-200+ endpoints) wanting single-vendor MDR + EPP/EDR/XDR. Choose Field Effect if: sMBs and MSPs wanting affordable, easy-to-deploy MDR with published per-user pricing. Bitdefender MDR is not ideal for organizations with an existing non-Bitdefender EDR they want to keep (requires GravityZone agent). Field Effect is not ideal for organizations with existing CrowdStrike/SentinelOne/Defender deployments — requires proprietary Field Effect agent.