Binary Defense vs SISA ProACT
Binary Defense is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. SISA ProACT is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Binary Defense targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Binary Defense includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
Buyer brief
Binary Defense is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. SISA ProACT is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Binary Defense targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; SISA ProACT serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Binary Defense includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network), compared to 0 for SISA ProACT ().
Binary Defense (Pure-play MDR) and SISA ProACT (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Binary Defense's binary defense's core differentiator is proactive threat hunting with an attacker's mindset, cons... or SISA ProACT's sisa proact fits payment-sector buyers that want mdr tied to forensics, pci expertise and ai-assi....
At a glance
| FIELD | ||
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Mid-market and enterprise organizations with existing EDR/SIEM investments they want to keep | Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 4/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise organizations with existing EDR/SIEM investments they want to keep
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 4/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Binary DefenseTECH-AGNOSTIC | SISA ProACTTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender for EndpointCrowdStrike FalconSentinelOneCarbon Black | Customer EDR |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelSplunkExabeamPalo Alto Cortex XSIAMGoogle Chronicle | Customer SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContainDisable accountsCustom playbooks | Disable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published. Custom quotes only. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | ≤30 minutes | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | Business hours |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing. MDR and MDR Plus tiers. Co-managed and fully managed options available. | Custom quote. SISA does not publish ProACT MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | MDR Plus features (deception, malware disruption) are add-ons beyond base MDR. IR is not included in base MDR, available as separate retainer. Requires direct connection to client network, VPN may impact delivery. Pricing not publicly disclosed, requires sales engagement | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment.. ProACT lists many stack components, including SIEM, EDR, CASB, UEBA, SOAR, threat hunting and dark web monitoring, so buyers should confirm which are included in the base quote.. Response automation is a major part of the pitch, so pre-approved SOAR actions and rollback rules should be documented before go-live.. DFIR and payment forensic services are adjacent SISA services, so buyers should confirm what investigation and response work is included in MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Monthly, Annual, Multi-year | Custom, ProACT Agentic SOC, ProACT MXDR, DFIR Retainer Services |
| Channels | SlackEmailPortalPhone | Portal |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | ✓ | – |
| SOC regions | North America | |
| Onboarding | 2-8 weeks depending on environment complexity. Requires direct connection to client network. | Not published. SISA says ProACT can use a customized and scalable stack with cloud and on-premise deployment options, but no standard onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | ManufacturingHealthcareFinancial ServicesTechnologyRetail | PaymentsFintechFinancial Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights rates 4.6/5 (30 reviews) and PeerSpot 9.2/10. Forrester Strong Performer in Q1 2025 (was Leader in 2021) with highest possible scores for endpoint detection, threat hunting, and community. Praise for technical depth, but Glassdoor employee rating is 2.5/5, and some customers report declining service quality. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on SISA's payment-security focus, ProACT Agentic SOC, forensic intelligence, 1,000+ customer claim, 40+ country footprint and PCI forensic-investigation credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, SOC delivery model, response authority and non-payment use cases directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | PCI DSSPCI PINPCI 3DSPCI P2PEPCI S3PCI S-SLCPCI MPoCSWIFTGDPR |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II (security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, privacy) | PCI Global Payment Forensic InvestigatorPCI Qualified Security AssessorPCI-recognized laboratory for MPoC security evaluationsPCI GEAR committee member |
| Founded | 2014 | 2006 |
| Data retention | Not published. | SISA says ProACT supports PCI-compliant cloud deployments and on-premise options for data localization requirements, including custom Kubernetes and GCP environments. No standard public MDR retention period was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Binary Defense and SISA ProACT?
Binary Defense is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SISA ProACT is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Binary Defense offers ≤30 minutes, SISA ProACT offers Not disclosed. Binary Defense covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 0 for SISA ProACT.
How do Binary Defense and SISA ProACT differ in response capabilities?
Binary Defense supports 4 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable. SISA ProACT supports 2 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Binary Defense pricing compare to SISA ProACT?
Binary Defense pricing: Not published. Custom quotes only.. SISA ProACT pricing: Not published. Watch for with Binary Defense: MDR Plus features (deception, malware disruption) are add-ons beyond base MDR; IR is not included in base MDR, available as separate retainer. Watch for with SISA ProACT: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment..
Should I choose Binary Defense or SISA ProACT?
Choose Binary Defense if: mid-market and enterprise organizations with existing EDR/SIEM investments they want to keep. Choose SISA ProACT if: banks, payment processors, fintechs and payment ecosystem buyers that want MDR informed by forensic-investigation experience. Binary Defense is not ideal for organizations needing global SOC coverage (SOC is US-based only, analysts work remotely). SISA ProACT is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.