Avertium vs Tesorion
Avertium is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Avertium targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Avertium includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Avertium is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Tesorion is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Avertium targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Tesorion serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Avertium includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity), compared to 4 for Tesorion (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity, Network).
Avertium (Pure-play MDR) and Tesorion (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Avertium's technology-agnostic mdr with deep microsoft, logrhythm, and sentinelone expertise or Tesorion's tesorion mdr fits dutch buyers that want local mdr delivered through t-soc and backed by t-cert, ....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Companies needing integrated MDR, compliance consulting, and GRC services from a single vendor | Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Companies needing integrated MDR, compliance consulting, and GRC services from a single vendor
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | AvertiumTECH-AGNOSTIC | TesorionTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint SentinelOne | Customer endpoint telemetry SentinelOne |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft SentinelLogRhythm NextGen SIEM | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Network | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size, coverage scope (endpoints, cloud, users), and platform choice. Annual subscription. | Custom quote. Tesorion does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Requires underlying platform licenses (Microsoft E5/Sentinel, LogRhythm, or SentinelOne), which Avertium can provide or customer can bring their own. Pricing scales significantly with number of assets, users, and coverage areas (endpoint, cloud, SaaS, network). No published pricing, requires custom quote for accurate cost comparison. Platform choice (Microsoft vs LogRhythm vs SentinelOne) significantly impacts total cost due to differing license models. Full DFIR (digital forensics and incident response) is a separate retainer or on-demand engagement, not included in base Fusion MXDR | Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval.. T-CERT incident response is prominent, but buyers should confirm whether IR hours are included in MDR or sold separately.. Tesorion lists broad coverage across domains, so buyers should confirm which monitored sources are included in base MDR. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Reports only |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North America | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published. Varies by platform and environment size. | Tesorion says MDR use cases are tailored per organisation and linked to mitigating measures. No standard public onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareFinancial ServicesManufacturingRetailHospitalityPublic Sector | Financial ServicesHealthcarePublic SectorManufacturingCritical InfrastructureTechnologyProfessional Services |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 4.7/5 (89 reviews for managed security services). Customers praise knowledgeable staff and flexible, tailored service. Limited public reviews compared to larger MDR providers. Glassdoor 4.4/5 (68 reviews), with 84% recommending to a friend. Minimal Reddit or G2 presence, making independent validation harder. | Tesorion has limited MDR-specific public review volume. The public buyer case rests on Dutch delivery, T-SOC operations, XDR and SOAR correlation, threat intelligence and nearby T-CERT incident response. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, included source scope and whether T-CERT support is included before signing. |
| Compliance | HIPAA (consulting services for customer compliance)PCI DSS (consulting services for customer compliance)NIST (consulting services for customer compliance)HITRUST (consulting services for customer compliance) | ISO 27001NEN 7510NIS2DORABIO |
| Certifications | Microsoft Verified MXDR Solution Status (April 2025)Microsoft Intelligent Security Association (MISA) memberMicrosoft Security Excellence Award 2026 winner, Security Trailblazer category (January 2026) | ISO 27001NEN 7510 |
| Founded | 2019 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Not published. Varies by underlying platform (Microsoft, LogRhythm, SentinelOne) | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Avertium and Tesorion?
Avertium is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Tesorion is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Avertium covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Tesorion.
How do Avertium and Tesorion differ in response capabilities?
Avertium supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, process termination) and approval is configurable. Tesorion supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Avertium pricing compare to Tesorion?
Avertium pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Tesorion pricing: Not published. Watch for with Avertium: Requires underlying platform licenses (Microsoft E5/Sentinel, LogRhythm, or SentinelOne), which Avertium can provide or customer can bring their own; Pricing scales significantly with number of assets, users, and coverage areas (endpoint, cloud, SaaS, network). Watch for with Tesorion: Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.; The public MDR page says mitigation is immediate where possible, but does not specify what Tesorion can do without customer approval..
Should I choose Avertium or Tesorion?
Choose Avertium if: mid-market and enterprise organizations already committed to Microsoft Sentinel, LogRhythm, or SentinelOne wanting managed SOC services. Choose Tesorion if: dutch organisations that want MDR from a Netherlands-based cybersecurity services firm. Avertium is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations needing transparent, published pricing and lower minimums. Tesorion is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or contractual response SLAs before sales engagement.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.