Avertium vs ITC Secure
Avertium is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Avertium targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; ITC Secure serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
Avertium is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Avertium targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; ITC Secure serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Avertium (Pure-play MDR) and ITC Secure (Microsoft-ecosystem) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Avertium's technology-agnostic mdr with deep microsoft, logrhythm, and sentinelone expertise or ITC Secure's itc secure fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mxdr with pulse portal visibility, service re....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Companies needing integrated MDR, compliance consulting, and GRC services from a single vendor | Microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 0/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Companies needing integrated MDR, compliance consulting, and GRC services from a single vendor
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | AvertiumTECH-AGNOSTIC | ITC SecureTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender for EndpointSentinelOne | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | LogRhythm NextGen SIEM Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Alert and notify only |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Network | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing based on environment size, coverage scope (endpoints, cloud, users), and platform choice. Annual subscription. | Custom quote. ITC Secure does not publish MXDR powered by Pulse package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Requires underlying platform licenses (Microsoft E5/Sentinel, LogRhythm, or SentinelOne), which Avertium can provide or customer can bring their own. Pricing scales significantly with number of assets, users, and coverage areas (endpoint, cloud, SaaS, network). No published pricing, requires custom quote for accurate cost comparison. Platform choice (Microsoft vs LogRhythm vs SentinelOne) significantly impacts total cost due to differing license models. Full DFIR (digital forensics and incident response) is a separate retainer or on-demand engagement, not included in base Fusion MXDR | Public pages do not publish MXDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is Microsoft-centric, so Microsoft licensing, tenant readiness and log ingestion should be priced before comparison.. ITC Secure publishes broad MXDR components, including endpoint, identity, Office 365, cloud apps, storage, vulnerability management and OT. Buyers should confirm which components are included in their quote.. Public pages do not define default response authority, so containment permissions and approval rules should be written into the contract.. Incident response is listed as a separate service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MXDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom, MXDR powered by Pulse, Managed services, Incident Response |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North America | |
| Onboarding | Not published. Varies by platform and environment size. | Not published. ITC Secure publishes security engineering and SOC onboarding as a build-and-deploy service, but no standard MXDR implementation duration was found. |
| Industry focus | HealthcareFinancial ServicesManufacturingRetailHospitalityPublic Sector | Not published |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Gartner Peer Insights 4.7/5 (89 reviews for managed security services). Customers praise knowledgeable staff and flexible, tailored service. Limited public reviews compared to larger MDR providers. Glassdoor 4.4/5 (68 reviews), with 84% recommending to a friend. Minimal Reddit or G2 presence, making independent validation harder. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on ITC Secure's Microsoft focus, Microsoft Verified Managed XDR status, Pulse portal, long managed-service history and broad MXDR service components. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, SOC operating model and exact component inclusion directly. |
| Compliance | HIPAA (consulting services for customer compliance)PCI DSS (consulting services for customer compliance)NIST (consulting services for customer compliance)HITRUST (consulting services for customer compliance) | ISO 27001Cyber Essentials PlusISO/IEC 20000-1 |
| Certifications | Microsoft Verified MXDR Solution Status (April 2025)Microsoft Intelligent Security Association (MISA) memberMicrosoft Security Excellence Award 2026 winner, Security Trailblazer category (January 2026) | Microsoft Verified Managed XDRMicrosoft Solutions Partner in SecurityMicrosoft Solutions Partner in Modern WorkMicrosoft Solutions Partner in Infrastructure AzureMicrosoft Intelligent Security AssociationCyber Essentials PlusISO/IEC 20000-1ISO/IEC 27001Great Place to Work Certification |
| Founded | 2019 | – |
| Data retention | Not published. Varies by underlying platform (Microsoft, LogRhythm, SentinelOne) | Not published. ITC Secure says Pulse provides visibility into customer security posture, activities, incident trends, Microsoft license consumption and service metrics. No standard public MXDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Avertium and ITC Secure?
Avertium is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Avertium and ITC Secure differ in response capabilities?
Avertium supports 5 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, process termination) and approval is configurable. ITC Secure supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and approval is configurable.
How does Avertium pricing compare to ITC Secure?
Avertium pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. ITC Secure pricing: Not published. Watch for with Avertium: Requires underlying platform licenses (Microsoft E5/Sentinel, LogRhythm, or SentinelOne), which Avertium can provide or customer can bring their own; Pricing scales significantly with number of assets, users, and coverage areas (endpoint, cloud, SaaS, network). Watch for with ITC Secure: Public pages do not publish MXDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is Microsoft-centric, so Microsoft licensing, tenant readiness and log ingestion should be priced before comparison..
Should I choose Avertium or ITC Secure?
Choose Avertium if: mid-market and enterprise organizations already committed to Microsoft Sentinel, LogRhythm, or SentinelOne wanting managed SOC services. Choose ITC Secure if: microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform. Avertium is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations needing transparent, published pricing and lower minimums. ITC Secure is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.