At-Bay Stance MDR vs ITC Secure
At-Bay Stance MDR is a Cyber insurer that requires its own security platform. ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. At-Bay Stance MDR targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; ITC Secure serves Mid-market and Enterprise. At-Bay Stance MDR includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 3 for ITC Secure (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity).
Buyer brief
At-Bay Stance MDR is a Cyber insurer that requires its own security platform. ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. At-Bay Stance MDR targets SMB and Mid-market organizations; ITC Secure serves Mid-market and Enterprise. At-Bay Stance MDR includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 3 for ITC Secure (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity).
At-Bay Stance MDR is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. ITC Secure is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | SMB and mid-market organizations that want hands-off MDR remediation rather than alert triage | Microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · No approval | 0/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Requires own platform | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- SMB and mid-market organizations that want hands-off MDR remediation rather than alert triage
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · No approval
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | At-Bay Stance MDRPLATFORM | ITC SecureTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Requires their platform | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | SentinelOne | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Optional add-onSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Not coveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Fully Autonomous | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateContain | Alert and notify only |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | Yes | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Identity | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | + Optional | ✓ Included |
| Network | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing. Packages page offers an estimated MDR cost flow and ties MDR to insurance package enhancements, but no public fixed price bands were found. | Custom quote. ITC Secure does not publish MXDR powered by Pulse package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Insurance premium credits and coverage enhancements are conditional and depend on the buyer's risk profile, policy terms and qualifying conditions.. Stance MDR is not required for At-Bay insurance coverage and is not limited to At-Bay policyholders, but the strongest value story is tied to cyber-insurance outcomes.. No public contractual SLA or service-credit table was found despite under-15-minute containment claims.. Specific EDR/email/cloud technologies and data export options should be confirmed in writing. | Public pages do not publish MXDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is Microsoft-centric, so Microsoft licensing, tenant readiness and log ingestion should be priced before comparison.. ITC Secure publishes broad MXDR components, including endpoint, identity, Office 365, cloud apps, storage, vulnerability management and OT. Buyers should confirm which components are included in their quote.. Public pages do not define default response authority, so containment permissions and approval rules should be written into the contract.. Incident response is listed as a separate service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MXDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom | Custom, MXDR powered by Pulse, Managed services, Incident Response |
| Channels | PortalEmail | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | ||
| Onboarding | Not published as a standard timeline. Customer testimonials say onboarding was quick and did not require complex setup or internal playbooks. | Not published. ITC Secure publishes security engineering and SOC onboarding as a build-and-deploy service, but no standard MXDR implementation duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Cyber InsuranceProfessional ServicesTechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareRetail | Not published |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Under 15 minutes from detection to containment on average (vendor-reported) | Not published |
| Community view | At-Bay has strong first-party customer testimonials on MDR pages, but little independent public MDR review signal was found in this pass. The market story is current and differentiated through InsurSec, SentinelOne partnership, claims data, and MSP channel materials, but buyer validation should rely on references until more third-party MDR reviews accumulate. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on ITC Secure's Microsoft focus, Microsoft Verified Managed XDR status, Pulse portal, long managed-service history and broad MXDR service components. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, SOC operating model and exact component inclusion directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | ISO 27001Cyber Essentials PlusISO/IEC 20000-1 |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II | Microsoft Verified Managed XDRMicrosoft Solutions Partner in SecurityMicrosoft Solutions Partner in Modern WorkMicrosoft Solutions Partner in Infrastructure AzureMicrosoft Intelligent Security AssociationCyber Essentials PlusISO/IEC 20000-1ISO/IEC 27001Great Place to Work Certification |
| Founded | 2016 | – |
| Data retention | Not published. Trust page states data is processed and stored exclusively in AWS data centers in the United States. | Not published. ITC Secure says Pulse provides visibility into customer security posture, activities, incident trends, Microsoft license consumption and service metrics. No standard public MXDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between At-Bay Stance MDR and ITC Secure?
At-Bay Stance MDR is a Cyber insurer that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). ITC Secure is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). At-Bay Stance MDR covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for ITC Secure.
How do At-Bay Stance MDR and ITC Secure differ in response capabilities?
At-Bay Stance MDR supports 2 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, network containment) and acts without approval. ITC Secure supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and approval is configurable.
How does At-Bay Stance MDR pricing compare to ITC Secure?
At-Bay Stance MDR pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found.. ITC Secure pricing: Not published. Watch for with At-Bay Stance MDR: Insurance premium credits and coverage enhancements are conditional and depend on the buyer's risk profile, policy terms and qualifying conditions.; Stance MDR is not required for At-Bay insurance coverage and is not limited to At-Bay policyholders, but the strongest value story is tied to cyber-insurance outcomes.. Watch for with ITC Secure: Public pages do not publish MXDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is Microsoft-centric, so Microsoft licensing, tenant readiness and log ingestion should be priced before comparison..
Should I choose At-Bay Stance MDR or ITC Secure?
Choose At-Bay Stance MDR if: sMB and mid-market organizations that want hands-off MDR remediation rather than alert triage. Choose ITC Secure if: microsoft-centered buyers that want a verified managed XDR provider rather than a pure-play MDR platform. At-Bay Stance MDR is not ideal for large enterprises needing published global SOC locations, formal SLA tables and mature third-party analyst validation. ITC Secure is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.