Arctic Wolf vs Mandiant: MDR Comparison 2026
Arctic Wolf (Pure-play MDR) and Mandiant (Services firm) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Arctic Wolf works with your existing tools, while Mandiant works with your existing tools. Arctic Wolf targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Mandiant focuses on Mid-market and Enterprise.
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Arctic Wolf vs Mandiant: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Arctic Wolf if:
- •Mid-market organizations (50-1000 employees) without a dedicated SOC
- •IT generalists overwhelmed by managing multiple security point solutions
- •Organizations wanting a technology-agnostic MDR that works with existing tools
- •Breach warranty matters to you (Arctic Wolf offers one, Mandiant does not)
Choose Mandiant if:
- •Enterprise organizations wanting elite threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR operations
- •Google Cloud Platform customers wanting native SecOps integration
- •Organizations facing nation-state or advanced persistent threats where Mandiant's frontline IR experience is critical
Bottom line: Arctic Wolf (Pure-play MDR) and Mandiant (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Arctic Wolf's strong concierge model for mid-market organizations needing a dedicated security partner or Mandiant's threat intelligence-driven mdr backed by 500+ intel analysts, frontline ir experience, and google....
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Arctic Wolf and Mandiant?
Arctic Wolf is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Mandiant is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Arctic Wolf offers ≤1 hour, Mandiant offers Not disclosed.
How do Arctic Wolf and Mandiant differ in response capabilities?
Arctic Wolf supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Mandiant supports 2 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Arctic Wolf pricing compare to Mandiant?
Arctic Wolf pricing: Starting ~$20/user/month; MDR Basic ~$44,000/year for up to 100 users. Enterprise pricing is custom.. Mandiant pricing: Estimated ~$83,000/year (third-party estimate from Vendr, not officially published).. Watch for with Arctic Wolf: Incident response and remediation is guided, not performed on your behalf — may need separate IR retainer; Normalized data and active threat feed not directly accessible to customers — security operates as a 'black box' for some. Watch for with Mandiant: ~$83K+/year estimated — premium enterprise pricing; IR retainer is separate — must be purchased independently for full incident response.
Should I choose Arctic Wolf or Mandiant?
Choose Arctic Wolf if: mid-market organizations (50-1000 employees) without a dedicated SOC. Choose Mandiant if: enterprise organizations wanting elite threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR operations. Arctic Wolf is not ideal for large enterprises requiring deep data access and custom detection engineering. Mandiant is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations — ~$83K+/year estimated pricing.