Arctic Wolf vs Daylight Security: MDR comparison 2026
Arctic Wolf is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Daylight Security is a Platform vendor that works with your existing tools. Arctic Wolf targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Daylight Security serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Arctic Wolf includes 3 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Identity, Network), compared to 1 for Daylight Security (Endpoint).
Key differences at a glance
Full comparison
Which should you choose?
Choose Arctic Wolf if:
- •Mid-market organizations without a dedicated SOC that want a named security team, not just a monitoring service
- •IT teams managing multiple security tools that want a single pane of glass without replacing their existing stack
- •Organizations that value the industry's largest breach warranty ($3M) and compliance-aligned security reviews
- •You need Identity and Network coverage included in base pricing
- •Breach warranty matters to you (Arctic Wolf offers one, Daylight Security does not)
Choose Daylight Security if:
- •Mid-market and enterprise buyers frustrated with alert fatigue from traditional MDR providers
- •Technology and finance companies comfortable adopting early-stage vendors with tier-1 VC backing
- •Teams wanting ChatOps-native collaboration via Slack/Teams with sub-hour deployment time
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Bottom line: Arctic Wolf (Pure-play MDR) and Daylight Security (Platform vendor) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Arctic Wolf's the concierge security team model is arctic wolf's core differentiator: a named team that knows y... or Daylight Security's ai-native mdr that deploys in under an hour and works with your existing edr.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between Arctic Wolf and Daylight Security?
Arctic Wolf is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Daylight Security is a Platform vendor that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Arctic Wolf offers ≤1 hour, Daylight Security offers Not disclosed. Arctic Wolf covers 3 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for Daylight Security.
How do Arctic Wolf and Daylight Security differ in response capabilities?
Arctic Wolf supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, network containment, account disable) and approval is configurable. Daylight Security supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Arctic Wolf and included with Daylight Security.
How does Arctic Wolf pricing compare to Daylight Security?
Arctic Wolf pricing: MDR Basic starts at $44,000/year for up to 100 users (AWS Marketplace). Median buyer-reported deal is $96,340/year based on 17 purchases (Vendr). Range: $29,176 to $319,984/year depending on scope.. Daylight Security pricing: $10-30/endpoint/month. Annual contracts typically $115,000-$130,000 for mid-market.. Watch for with Arctic Wolf: Remediation is guided, not performed on your behalf. May need a separate IR retainer for hands-on incident response.; Normalized data and threat feeds are not directly accessible. You get dashboards and reports, not raw data.. Watch for with Daylight Security: Founded late 2024 with no public compliance certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001). If your procurement requires these, you may face delays or blockers.; Identity and cloud workload modules are on the roadmap but not GA. You may need separate tooling for those surfaces now..
Should I choose Arctic Wolf or Daylight Security?
Choose Arctic Wolf if: mid-market organizations without a dedicated SOC that want a named security team, not just a monitoring service. Choose Daylight Security if: mid-market and enterprise buyers frustrated with alert fatigue from traditional MDR providers. Arctic Wolf is not ideal for security teams that want direct access to raw telemetry, custom detection engineering, or SIEM query capabilities. Daylight Security is not ideal for risk-averse organizations requiring multi-year proven operational track record and independent reviews.