Stoik vs Wirespeed
Stoik and Wirespeed are both Cyber insurers that work with your existing tools. Stoik targets SMB organizations, while Wirespeed serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Stoik includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 4 for Wirespeed (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
Buyer brief
Stoik and Wirespeed are both Cyber insurers that work with your existing tools. Stoik targets SMB organizations, while Wirespeed serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Stoik includes 1 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint), compared to 4 for Wirespeed (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity).
Wirespeed offers broader coverage (4 surfaces vs. 1). Stoik may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD | ||
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | European SMEs wanting cyber insurance and MDR in one broker-sold bundle | MSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 0/6 actions · Approval required | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- European SMEs wanting cyber insurance and MDR in one broker-sold bundle
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 0/6 actions · Approval required
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- MSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
›› Detailed comparison
| FIELD | StoikTECH-AGNOSTIC | WirespeedTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| ›› Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| ›› Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | CrowdStrike | CrowdStrike FalconMicrosoft Defender for EndpointSentinelOnePalo Alto Networks CortexJamf ProtectCheck Point HarmonyHalcyon |
| SIEM integrations | None listed | Microsoft SentinelGeneric Syslog LogsGeneric JSON Logs |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Not coveredIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: Not coveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| ›› Response | ||
| Response type | Guided Response | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Approval Required | Configurable |
| Response actions | Alert and notify only | IsolateDisable accountsCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| ›› Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published. MDR is not priced separately from insurance. | Custom pricing. No public per-user, per-endpoint or platform price found. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| ›› More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| Identity | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| Network | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | Extra cost | Extra cost |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Bundled annual pricing combining cyber insurance and MDR. Price varies by company size, revenue, sector and coverage tier. Sold through 2,000+ broker partners only. | Custom pricing. Pricing page says Wirespeed works out pricing by organization and offers direct pricing for enterprises, partner pricing for MSP/MSSPs, and reseller/channel programs. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Requires CrowdStrike Falcon EDR deployment. Cannot use a competing endpoint agent.. MDR is only available bundled with a Stoik insurance policy. No standalone MDR purchase option.. Sold through broker partners only. No direct purchase from Stoik.. Revenue cap: companies up to 1B EUR turnover (expanded from 750M EUR after CyberContract acquisition in September 2025). | The strongest strategic story is Coalition Active Insurance plus automated MDR, but Wirespeed's standalone-versus-Coalition-bundled commercial model should be confirmed.. No public fixed price bands or minimums were found.. No public contractual response SLA or service-credit table was found.. Auto-containment is opt-in and is skipped for beta integrations, so buyers must confirm which integrations support automatic action.. This is an automation-heavy MDR model. Buyers expecting named SOC analysts or human-led threat hunting should validate service scope carefully. |
| Data portability | Limited | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | SlackTeamsEmailPortal |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Europe | North America |
| Onboarding | CrowdStrike Falcon agent deployment, no minimum endpoint requirement published | Not published as a standard timeline. Documentation says customers connect a user directory, detection source, communication channel and containment settings through API/OAuth integrations. |
| Industry focus | Professional ServicesRetailManufacturingTechnology | Cyber InsuranceManaged Service ProvidersTechnologyProfessional ServicesFinancial ServicesHealthcare |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published as MTTD. Coalition reports median time to verdict of 1,801 milliseconds. |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published as MTTR. Wirespeed says containment can happen in seconds when configured and supported by the integration. |
| Community view | Almost no English-language reviews. 10,000+ insured companies and 200%+ YoY growth show market traction in continental Europe. Backed by a16z, Munich Re Ventures and Alven (~$78M raised through Series C in Jan 2026). Practitioner sentiment on MDR quality is impossible to gauge from public sources. | Wirespeed is very new, so independent MDR review data is thin. Public differentiation is strong: automation-first MDR, broad integrations, MSP/MSSP positioning and Coalition's Active Insurance acquisition. The trade-off is limited third-party validation and open questions about post-acquisition packaging. |
| Compliance | GDPR | SOC 2CMMC Level 2 support statement |
| Certifications | – | SOC 2 report available via Wirespeed Trust CenterSOC 2 attestation; CMMC support letter says Type I, while current site/trust materials should be checked for Type II status |
| Founded | 2021 | 2024 |
| Data retention | Not published | Pricing page lists 90 days of data lake retention. Long-term retention, export and Coalition data-sharing boundaries should be confirmed in contract. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
›› FAQ
What is the main difference between Stoik and Wirespeed?
Stoik is a Cyber insurer that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Wirespeed is a Cyber insurer that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Stoik covers 1 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 4 for Wirespeed.
How do Stoik and Wirespeed differ in response capabilities?
Stoik supports 0 autonomous actions (none) and requires approval before acting. Wirespeed supports 3 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Stoik and not included with Wirespeed.
How does Stoik pricing compare to Wirespeed?
Stoik pricing: Not published. MDR is not priced separately from insurance.. Wirespeed pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user, per-endpoint or platform price found.. Watch for with Stoik: Requires CrowdStrike Falcon EDR deployment. Cannot use a competing endpoint agent.; MDR is only available bundled with a Stoik insurance policy. No standalone MDR purchase option.. Watch for with Wirespeed: The strongest strategic story is Coalition Active Insurance plus automated MDR, but Wirespeed's standalone-versus-Coalition-bundled commercial model should be confirmed.; No public fixed price bands or minimums were found..
Should I choose Stoik or Wirespeed?
Choose Stoik if: european SMEs wanting cyber insurance and MDR in one broker-sold bundle. Choose Wirespeed if: mSPs and MSSPs that want to add or scale MDR without hiring a large analyst team. Stoik is not ideal for organizations needing active remediation or autonomous containment. Wirespeed is not ideal for buyers that require named analysts, scheduled threat hunts and human-led SOC review for every case.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.