SISA ProACT vs Trend Micro
SISA ProACT is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Trend Micro is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. SISA ProACT targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Trend Micro serves Mid-market and Enterprise. SISA ProACT includes 0 attack surfaces in base pricing (), compared to 5 for Trend Micro (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
SISA ProACT is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Trend Micro is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. SISA ProACT targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Trend Micro serves Mid-market and Enterprise. SISA ProACT includes 0 attack surfaces in base pricing (), compared to 5 for Trend Micro (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Trend Micro is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. SISA ProACT is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider | Mid-market and enterprise organizations (251+ users) already invested in Trend Micro ecosystem |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Reports only | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise organizations (251+ users) already invested in Trend Micro ecosystem
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | SISA ProACTTECH-AGNOSTIC | Trend MicroPLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | Customer EDR | Trend Micro |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM | SplunkMicrosoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Disable accountsCustom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not publicly disclosed. Custom pricing via quote. |
| Minimum seats | None | 251 |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | Business hours | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. SISA does not publish ProACT MDR package pricing. | Credit-based system under 12-month contract. Tiered pricing by user count (251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-2,000). Credits drawn down monthly. PAYG available for additional usage beyond credits. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment.. ProACT lists many stack components, including SIEM, EDR, CASB, UEBA, SOAR, threat hunting and dark web monitoring, so buyers should confirm which are included in the base quote.. Response automation is a major part of the pitch, so pre-approved SOAR actions and rollback rules should be documented before go-live.. DFIR and payment forensic services are adjacent SISA services, so buyers should confirm what investigation and response work is included in MDR. | Minimum 251 users eliminates small businesses. Best performance requires full Trend Vision One stack. Third-party EDR integration is less effective.. Extended data retention (beyond 30 days) costs extra, up to 365 days available. Credit model means unused credits expire at contract end unless moved to other Trend solutions |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, ProACT Agentic SOC, ProACT MXDR, DFIR Retainer Services | Annual, PAYG |
| Channels | Portal | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific | |
| Onboarding | Not published. SISA says ProACT can use a customized and scalable stack with cloud and on-premise deployment options, but no standard onboarding duration was found. | Requires Vision One deployment before MDR onboarding. Specific timeline not published. |
| Industry focus | PaymentsFintechFinancial Services | Financial ServicesHealthcareManufacturingGovernmentEnergy |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on SISA's payment-security focus, ProACT Agentic SOC, forensic intelligence, 1,000+ customer claim, 40+ country footprint and PCI forensic-investigation credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, SOC delivery model, response authority and non-payment use cases directly. | Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader for 20 consecutive years in endpoint protection. Vision One rated 8.6/10 on PeerSpot, ranked #2 in XDR. MITRE ATT&CK 2024: 100% detection with 86% actionable rate. Praised for unified visibility and platform breadth. Criticized for requiring Trend platform commitment and pooled analyst model. |
| Compliance | PCI DSSPCI PINPCI 3DSPCI P2PEPCI S3PCI S-SLCPCI MPoCSWIFTGDPR | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001FedRAMPHIPAAGDPR |
| Certifications | PCI Global Payment Forensic InvestigatorPCI Qualified Security AssessorPCI-recognized laboratory for MPoC security evaluationsPCI GEAR committee member | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001FedRAMPGartner Magic Quadrant Leader (Endpoint Protection, 20 consecutive years)MITRE ATT&CK Evaluations participant (2024) |
| Founded | 2006 | 1988 |
| Data retention | SISA says ProACT supports PCI-compliant cloud deployments and on-premise options for data localization requirements, including custom Kubernetes and GCP environments. No standard public MDR retention period was found. | 30 days default for raw data, up to 365 days with extended storage. Alert workbenches retained 180 days. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between SISA ProACT and Trend Micro?
SISA ProACT is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Trend Micro is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SISA ProACT covers 0 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Trend Micro.
How do SISA ProACT and Trend Micro differ in response capabilities?
SISA ProACT supports 2 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Trend Micro supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does SISA ProACT pricing compare to Trend Micro?
SISA ProACT pricing: Not published. Trend Micro pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Custom pricing via quote. (251-seat minimum). Watch for with SISA ProACT: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment.. Watch for with Trend Micro: Minimum 251 users eliminates small businesses; Best performance requires full Trend Vision One stack. Third-party EDR integration is less effective..
Should I choose SISA ProACT or Trend Micro?
Choose SISA ProACT if: banks, payment processors, fintechs and payment ecosystem buyers that want MDR informed by forensic-investigation experience. Choose Trend Micro if: mid-market and enterprise organizations (251+ users) already invested in Trend Micro ecosystem. SISA ProACT is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Trend Micro is not ideal for small businesses under 251 users (minimum requirement eliminates SMBs).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.