SISA ProACT vs ThreatSpike
SISA ProACT is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. ThreatSpike is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. SISA ProACT targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; ThreatSpike serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. SISA ProACT includes 0 attack surfaces in base pricing (), compared to 5 for ThreatSpike (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
SISA ProACT is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. ThreatSpike is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. SISA ProACT targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; ThreatSpike serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. SISA ProACT includes 0 attack surfaces in base pricing (), compared to 5 for ThreatSpike (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
ThreatSpike is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. SISA ProACT is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider | Lean IT or security teams that want the provider to own both IT operations context and security response |
| Price | Custom quote | Managed IT + security bundle: $135/user/mo |
| Response authority | 2/6 actions · Configurable | 2/6 actions · No approval |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Regulated organizations that need MDR plus PCI, payment forensics and incident-response depth from the same provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Reports only
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Lean IT or security teams that want the provider to own both IT operations context and security response
- Price
- Managed IT + security bundle: $135/user/mo
- Response authority
- 2/6 actions · No approval
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | SISA ProACTTECH-AGNOSTIC | ThreatSpikePLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | Customer EDR | ThreatSpike proprietary EDR |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM | Third-party feeds supported, specific SIEM integrations not published |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: LimitedCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Fully Autonomous |
| Response actions | Disable accountsCustom playbooks | IsolateContain |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Published fixed $135/user/month for broader managed IT + security subscription, not MDR-only. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | Business hours | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. SISA does not publish ProACT MDR package pricing. | Published fixed per-user monthly subscription bundling fully managed IT, defensive security and offensive security. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment.. ProACT lists many stack components, including SIEM, EDR, CASB, UEBA, SOAR, threat hunting and dark web monitoring, so buyers should confirm which are included in the base quote.. Response automation is a major part of the pitch, so pre-approved SOAR actions and rollback rules should be documented before go-live.. DFIR and payment forensic services are adjacent SISA services, so buyers should confirm what investigation and response work is included in MDR. | ThreatSpike is not a narrow MDR-only SKU. Buyers that only want monitoring on top of an existing IT team may be buying a broader managed IT replacement model.. The platform is proprietary and built in-house. Validate exit process, data export and whether existing EDR/SIEM investments can remain primary.. $135/user/month can be attractive if it replaces IT, MDR and pen testing vendors, but expensive if treated as MDR-only.. No public contractual SLA or service-credit language was found despite the 2 to 5 minute response claim. |
| Data portability | Partial | Limited |
| Contract terms | Custom, ProACT Agentic SOC, ProACT MXDR, DFIR Retainer Services | Custom |
| Channels | Portal | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Reports only | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | ||
| Onboarding | Not published. SISA says ProACT can use a customized and scalable stack with cloud and on-premise deployment options, but no standard onboarding duration was found. | Not published as a standard MDR onboarding timeline. |
| Industry focus | PaymentsFintechFinancial Services | HospitalityFinancial ServicesManufacturingProfessional ServicesRetail |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | 2 to 5 minute automated incident response/resolve time (vendor-reported) |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on SISA's payment-security focus, ProACT Agentic SOC, forensic intelligence, 1,000+ customer claim, 40+ country footprint and PCI forensic-investigation credentials. Buyers should validate pricing, SOC delivery model, response authority and non-payment use cases directly. | G2 shows 4.9/5 across 32 reviews, with most reviews categorized under Managed Security Services and a mix of SMB, mid-market and enterprise reviewers. Review themes support the consolidation, support and pricing story, but independent analyst coverage appears thinner than larger MDR providers and public review volume is still modest. |
| Compliance | PCI DSSPCI PINPCI 3DSPCI P2PEPCI S3PCI S-SLCPCI MPoCSWIFTGDPR | ISO 27001Cyber Essentials PlusPCI DSS |
| Certifications | PCI Global Payment Forensic InvestigatorPCI Qualified Security AssessorPCI-recognized laboratory for MPoC security evaluationsPCI GEAR committee member | ISO 27001Cyber Essentials PlusCREST-certified penetration testing providerPCI DSS compliant |
| Founded | 2006 | 2011 |
| Data retention | SISA says ProACT supports PCI-compliant cloud deployments and on-premise options for data localization requirements, including custom Kubernetes and GCP environments. No standard public MDR retention period was found. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between SISA ProACT and ThreatSpike?
SISA ProACT is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ThreatSpike is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SISA ProACT covers 0 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for ThreatSpike.
How do SISA ProACT and ThreatSpike differ in response capabilities?
SISA ProACT supports 2 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. ThreatSpike supports 2 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, network containment) and acts without approval. Incident response is not included with SISA ProACT and included with ThreatSpike.
How does SISA ProACT pricing compare to ThreatSpike?
SISA ProACT pricing: Not published. ThreatSpike pricing: Published fixed $135/user/month for broader managed IT + security subscription, not MDR-only.. Watch for with SISA ProACT: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The service is heavily payment-security oriented, so non-payment buyers should confirm whether use cases fit their environment.. Watch for with ThreatSpike: ThreatSpike is not a narrow MDR-only SKU. Buyers that only want monitoring on top of an existing IT team may be buying a broader managed IT replacement model.; The platform is proprietary and built in-house. Validate exit process, data export and whether existing EDR/SIEM investments can remain primary..
Should I choose SISA ProACT or ThreatSpike?
Choose SISA ProACT if: banks, payment processors, fintechs and payment ecosystem buyers that want MDR informed by forensic-investigation experience. Choose ThreatSpike if: sMB and mid-market organizations that want to replace fragmented MSP, MDR and penetration-testing vendors with one fixed-price provider. SISA ProACT is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. ThreatSpike is not ideal for organizations seeking a narrow MDR overlay on top of an existing mature SOC and tool stack.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.