Sattrix vs Truesec
Sattrix and Truesec are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Sattrix targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while Truesec serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Sattrix includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 5 for Truesec (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Sattrix and Truesec are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Sattrix targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while Truesec serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Sattrix includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 5 for Truesec (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Truesec offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 2). Sattrix may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | India, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider | Nordic enterprises wanting the largest regional SOC with local language support |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 5/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- India, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Nordic enterprises wanting the largest regional SOC with local language support
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | SattrixTECH-AGNOSTIC | TruesecTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer EDR | Microsoft DefenderCrowdStrikeSentinelOnePalo Alto Cortex |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM | Microsoft SentinelCrowdStrike Falcon LogScaleSplunk |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Sattrix says managed SOC pricing can vary by needs, monitored assets and service level, but does not publish package prices. | Fixed fee per endpoint. No log volume or retention surcharges. No public pricing for any tier. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Sattrix lists flexible monitoring windows, so buyers should confirm whether their quote includes round-the-clock MDR coverage.. The MDR page refers to SIEM, EDR and endpoint-protection integrations, so buyers should confirm who owns each tool license.. SOC, SOAR, vulnerability management and incident response are adjacent service lines, so buyers should document what is included in MDR.. Public pages do not publish a standard onboarding duration or log-retention period. | No public pricing for any tier, requires sales engagement for any estimate. IR is a separate retainer on Core and Enterprise, only Black includes it. US customers may get a different experience since bulk of 350+ specialists are in Europe |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, MDR Services, SOC as a Service, SOAR as a Service, Hybrid SOC Management | Annual, Multi-year |
| Channels | EmailPhone | PortalEmailPhoneTeamsSlack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | APAC | EuropeNorth America |
| Onboarding | Not published. Sattrix says MDR integrates with existing security tools such as SIEM, EDR and endpoint protection, but no standard onboarding duration was found. | 72 hours for Core and Enterprise. Black tier not disclosed. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareRetailGovernmentTechnologyManufacturingEducation | Financial ServicesGovernmentHealthcareEnergyCritical Infrastructure |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Sattrix publishes Gartner-linked MDR testimonials on its own about and partnership pages, including comments about SOC services, 24/7 monitoring and remote response. No broad independent public MDR review signal was found during this pass, so buyers should validate delivery model, pricing, response authority and tool ownership directly. | Effectively unrateable. No public reviews on G2, PeerSpot, or Gartner Peer Insights. Not in Forrester Wave or Gartner MQ for MDR. No Reddit mentions. Strong Nordic reputation based on vendor claims and partner references (EY, Microsoft MISA), but impossible to validate through independent peer feedback. |
| Compliance | PCI DSSHIPAAGDPRCCPA | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 14001MISA (Microsoft Intelligent Security Association) |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001ISO 9001:2015ISO 27001:2013Startup India DIPP recognition | ISO 27001ISO 9001ISO 14001 |
| Founded | 2013 | 2005 |
| Data retention | Sattrix discusses compliance reporting, log monitoring and privacy mandates, but no standard public MDR data-retention period was found. | Included in fixed fee, no log volume or retention surcharges. Specific retention periods not disclosed. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Sattrix and Truesec?
Sattrix is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Truesec is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Sattrix covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Truesec.
How do Sattrix and Truesec differ in response capabilities?
Sattrix supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Truesec supports 5 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Sattrix and not included with Truesec.
How does Sattrix pricing compare to Truesec?
Sattrix pricing: Not published. Truesec pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Sattrix: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Sattrix lists flexible monitoring windows, so buyers should confirm whether their quote includes round-the-clock MDR coverage.. Watch for with Truesec: No public pricing for any tier, requires sales engagement for any estimate; IR is a separate retainer on Core and Enterprise, only Black includes it.
Should I choose Sattrix or Truesec?
Choose Sattrix if: india, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider. Choose Truesec if: nordic enterprises wanting the largest regional SOC with local language support. Sattrix is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Truesec is not ideal for uS-based organizations wanting a fully staffed local SOC (bulk of specialists in Europe).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.