Sattrix vs Sygnia
Sattrix and Sygnia are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Sattrix targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while Sygnia serves Enterprise. Sattrix includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 5 for Sygnia (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Sattrix and Sygnia are both Services firms that work with your existing tools. Sattrix targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations, while Sygnia serves Enterprise. Sattrix includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Network), compared to 5 for Sygnia (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Sygnia offers broader coverage (5 surfaces vs. 2). Sattrix may suit teams that need depth over breadth.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | India, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider | Enterprises wanting MDR and IR from the same team with no handoff or separate retainer |
| Price | Custom quote | Not published |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- India, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Enterprises wanting MDR and IR from the same team with no handoff or separate retainer
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | SattrixTECH-AGNOSTIC | SygniaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Customer EDR | CrowdStrikeSentinelOneMicrosoft DefenderCarbon BlackSophosSymantec Endpoint ProtectionBitdefenderCisco Secure EndpointFortinet FortiEDRPalo Alto Cortex |
| SIEM integrations | Customer SIEM | SplunkMicrosoft SentinelSumo Logic |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Sattrix says managed SOC pricing can vary by needs, monitored assets and service level, but does not publish package prices. | Enterprise custom pricing only. No published tiers or self-service quotes. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Sattrix lists flexible monitoring windows, so buyers should confirm whether their quote includes round-the-clock MDR coverage.. The MDR page refers to SIEM, EDR and endpoint-protection integrations, so buyers should confirm who owns each tool license.. SOC, SOAR, vulnerability management and incident response are adjacent service lines, so buyers should document what is included in MDR.. Public pages do not publish a standard onboarding duration or log-retention period. | No published pricing, requires significant sales engagement for a ballpark quote. 8 dedicated experts per client implies premium pricing, likely $200K+/year. Custom detection rules (up to 200) built in Velocity are not portable if you leave |
| Data portability | Partial | Limited |
| Contract terms | Custom, MDR Services, SOC as a Service, SOAR as a Service, Hybrid SOC Management | Custom |
| Channels | EmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | ✓ |
| SOC regions | APAC | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Not published. Sattrix says MDR integrates with existing security tools such as SIEM, EDR and endpoint protection, but no standard onboarding duration was found. | Not publicly disclosed |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesHealthcareRetailGovernmentTechnologyManufacturingEducation | Financial ServicesHealthcareEnergyIndustrial/ManufacturingTechnology |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Sattrix publishes Gartner-linked MDR testimonials on its own about and partnership pages, including comments about SOC services, 24/7 monitoring and remote response. No broad independent public MDR review signal was found during this pass, so buyers should validate delivery model, pricing, response authority and tool ownership directly. | Thin public review presence. No G2 or Reddit reviews. Gartner Peer Insights has a listing with limited reviews. PeerSpot has a profile but minimal MDR-specific feedback. Gartner DFIR Market Guide Representative Vendor four consecutive years (2022-2025). Two CEO changes in six months (2025). |
| Compliance | PCI DSSHIPAAGDPRCCPA | SOC 2 Type II |
| Certifications | ISO/IEC 27001ISO 9001:2015ISO 27001:2013Startup India DIPP recognition | SOC 2 Type II |
| Founded | 2013 | 2015 |
| Data retention | Sattrix discusses compliance reporting, log monitoring and privacy mandates, but no standard public MDR data-retention period was found. | Sygnia-managed Snowflake data lake. No stated retention limit. Export process on exit not documented. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Sattrix and Sygnia?
Sattrix is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Sygnia is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Sattrix covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Sygnia.
How do Sattrix and Sygnia differ in response capabilities?
Sattrix supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Sygnia supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does Sattrix pricing compare to Sygnia?
Sattrix pricing: Not published. Sygnia pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Watch for with Sattrix: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Sattrix lists flexible monitoring windows, so buyers should confirm whether their quote includes round-the-clock MDR coverage.. Watch for with Sygnia: No published pricing, requires significant sales engagement for a ballpark quote; 8 dedicated experts per client implies premium pricing, likely $200K+/year.
Should I choose Sattrix or Sygnia?
Choose Sattrix if: india, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider. Choose Sygnia if: enterprises wanting MDR and IR from the same team with no handoff or separate retainer. Sattrix is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Sygnia is not ideal for sMBs or mid-market organizations (enterprise-only pricing, likely $200K+/year).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.