Quorum Cyber vs Sattrix
Quorum Cyber is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Sattrix is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Quorum Cyber targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Sattrix serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Quorum Cyber includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity), compared to 2 for Sattrix (Endpoint, Network).
Buyer brief
Quorum Cyber is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Sattrix is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Quorum Cyber targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Sattrix serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Quorum Cyber includes 4 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity), compared to 2 for Sattrix (Endpoint, Network).
Quorum Cyber (Microsoft-ecosystem) and Sattrix (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Quorum Cyber's the strongest microsoft-native mdr option with a tiered model spanning smb to enterprise, backed ... or Sattrix's sattrix mdr fits buyers that want a services-led provider for managed detection, threat hunting a....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | SMBs needing affordable 24/7 MDR via Clarity Defend, with a growth path to enterprise-grade Protect tier | India, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 6/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- SMBs needing affordable 24/7 MDR via Clarity Defend, with a growth path to enterprise-grade Protect tier
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- India, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | Quorum CyberTECH-AGNOSTIC | SattrixTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | Customer EDR |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Customer SIEM |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Limited |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published. Contact for custom quote. | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Not published. Described as 'flexible subscription model' with pricing based on environment size and risk profile. | Custom quote. Sattrix says managed SOC pricing can vary by needs, monitored assets and service level, but does not publish package prices. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Requires Microsoft licensing (E3/E5 or standalone Defender licenses) as a prerequisite. These costs are separate and can be significant.. Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are usage-based and billed separately by Microsoft. Data ingestion charges can spike unpredictably.. Identity coverage (ITDR) and data security (Clarity Data) are separate services at lower tiers. AWS and GCP coverage only available in Clarity Protect (top tier) | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. Sattrix lists flexible monitoring windows, so buyers should confirm whether their quote includes round-the-clock MDR coverage.. The MDR page refers to SIEM, EDR and endpoint-protection integrations, so buyers should confirm who owns each tool license.. SOC, SOAR, vulnerability management and incident response are adjacent service lines, so buyers should document what is included in MDR.. Public pages do not publish a standard onboarding duration or log-retention period. |
| Data portability | Full | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom, MDR Services, SOC as a Service, SOAR as a Service, Hybrid SOC Management |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPhone |
| Data access | Full query access | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeNorth America | APAC |
| Onboarding | Not published | Not published. Sattrix says MDR integrates with existing security tools such as SIEM, EDR and endpoint protection, but no standard onboarding duration was found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEducationPublic SectorManufacturingProfessional Services | Financial ServicesHealthcareRetailGovernmentTechnologyManufacturingEducation |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | Named in the Gartner Market Guide for MDR as Representative Vendor (2024, 2025). Microsoft Security MSSP of the Year 2025. First UK Microsoft Verified MXDR provider. Very limited independent review data: no ratings on G2, PeerSpot, or Gartner Peer Insights with sufficient reviews. Zero Reddit presence. | Sattrix publishes Gartner-linked MDR testimonials on its own about and partnership pages, including comments about SOC services, 24/7 monitoring and remote response. No broad independent public MDR review signal was found during this pass, so buyers should validate delivery model, pricing, response authority and tool ownership directly. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001Cyber Essentials | PCI DSSHIPAAGDPRCCPA |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001 (UKAS-level audit)CREST (Vulnerability Assessment, Pen Testing, CSIR)Cyber EssentialsMicrosoft Verified MXDR SolutionMicrosoft Solutions Partner for SecurityMicrosoft Security MSSP of the Year 2025Gartner Market Guide for MDR Representative Vendor (2024, 2025) | ISO/IEC 27001ISO 9001:2015ISO 27001:2013Startup India DIPP recognition |
| Founded | 2016 | 2013 |
| Data retention | Data resides in customer's own Microsoft Sentinel instance / Azure tenant. Retention governed by customer's Azure configuration. | Sattrix discusses compliance reporting, log monitoring and privacy mandates, but no standard public MDR data-retention period was found. |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Quorum Cyber and Sattrix?
Quorum Cyber is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Sattrix is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Quorum Cyber covers 4 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 2 for Sattrix.
How do Quorum Cyber and Sattrix differ in response capabilities?
Quorum Cyber supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Sattrix supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Quorum Cyber and included with Sattrix.
How does Quorum Cyber pricing compare to Sattrix?
Quorum Cyber pricing: Not published. Contact for custom quote.. Sattrix pricing: Not published. Watch for with Quorum Cyber: Requires Microsoft licensing (E3/E5 or standalone Defender licenses) as a prerequisite. These costs are separate and can be significant.; Microsoft Sentinel consumption costs are usage-based and billed separately by Microsoft. Data ingestion charges can spike unpredictably.. Watch for with Sattrix: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; Sattrix lists flexible monitoring windows, so buyers should confirm whether their quote includes round-the-clock MDR coverage..
Should I choose Quorum Cyber or Sattrix?
Choose Quorum Cyber if: microsoft-committed organizations (E3/E5) wanting MDR built natively on Sentinel and Defender with data staying in their own Azure tenant. Choose Sattrix if: india, MEA and Americas buyers that want MDR from a services-led security provider. Quorum Cyber is not ideal for organizations running CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or any non-Microsoft primary EDR. Quorum Cyber is Microsoft-only.. Sattrix is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.