Performanta vs Trend Micro
Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Trend Micro is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Performanta targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Trend Micro serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Performanta includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Identity), compared to 5 for Trend Micro (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Trend Micro is a Platform vendor that requires its own security platform. Performanta targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Trend Micro serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Performanta includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Identity), compared to 5 for Trend Micro (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Trend Micro is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Performanta is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response | Mid-market and enterprise organizations (251+ users) already invested in Trend Micro ecosystem |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Requires own platform |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Mid-market and enterprise organizations (251+ users) already invested in Trend Micro ecosystem
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Requires own platform
- Data access
- Full query access
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | PerformantaTECH-AGNOSTIC | Trend MicroPLATFORM |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Requires their platform |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | Trend Micro |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Splunk Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not publicly disclosed. Custom pricing via quote. |
| Minimum seats | None | 251 |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | Yes |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | + Optional |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Performanta does not publish MDR, Safe XDR or managed SOC package pricing. | Credit-based system under 12-month contract. Tiered pricing by user count (251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-2,000). Credits drawn down monthly. PAYG available for additional usage beyond credits. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Public pages do not define default MDR response authority, so buyers need the managed-technology boundary in writing.. Cloud and SaaS coverage appear tied to Microsoft security controls and Safe XDR scope, so non-Microsoft telemetry should be confirmed early.. Incident response is listed as a consulting service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. | Minimum 251 users eliminates small businesses. Best performance requires full Trend Vision One stack. Third-party EDR integration is less effective.. Extended data retention (beyond 30 days) costs extra, up to 365 days available. Credit model means unused credits expire at contract end unless moved to other Trend solutions |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Safe XDR, MDR for Defender for Endpoint | Annual, PAYG |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Full query access |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeAfrica | North AmericaEuropeAsia-Pacific |
| Onboarding | Not published. Performanta describes scoping, discovery, prioritisation, validation and mobilisation stages for Safe XDR, but no standard implementation duration was found. | Requires Vision One deployment before MDR onboarding. Specific timeline not published. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEducationHealthcareGovernmentRetailProfessional ServicesAgricultureTelecommunicationsManufacturingTransportationTourism | Financial ServicesHealthcareManufacturingGovernmentEnergy |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Performanta's Microsoft security focus, UK and South Africa SOC operations, Safe XDR platform, threat-hunting process and incident-response consulting depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, non-Microsoft telemetry support and exact incident-response inclusion directly. | Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader for 20 consecutive years in endpoint protection. Vision One rated 8.6/10 on PeerSpot, ranked #2 in XDR. MITRE ATT&CK 2024: 100% detection with 86% actionable rate. Praised for unified visibility and platform breadth. Criticized for requiring Trend platform commitment and pooled analyst model. |
| Compliance | – | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001FedRAMPHIPAAGDPR |
| Certifications | – | SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001FedRAMPGartner Magic Quadrant Leader (Endpoint Protection, 20 consecutive years)MITRE ATT&CK Evaluations participant (2024) |
| Founded | 2010 | 1988 |
| Data retention | Not published. Performanta says it monitors customer environments and SIEM platforms, but no standard public MDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. | 30 days default for raw data, up to 365 days with extended storage. Alert workbenches retained 180 days. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Performanta and Trend Micro?
Performanta is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Trend Micro is a Platform vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Performanta covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Trend Micro.
How do Performanta and Trend Micro differ in response capabilities?
Performanta supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Trend Micro supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does Performanta pricing compare to Trend Micro?
Performanta pricing: Not published. Trend Micro pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Custom pricing via quote. (251-seat minimum). Watch for with Performanta: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Watch for with Trend Micro: Minimum 251 users eliminates small businesses; Best performance requires full Trend Vision One stack. Third-party EDR integration is less effective..
Should I choose Performanta or Trend Micro?
Choose Performanta if: buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response. Choose Trend Micro if: mid-market and enterprise organizations (251+ users) already invested in Trend Micro ecosystem. Performanta is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Trend Micro is not ideal for small businesses under 251 users (minimum requirement eliminates SMBs).
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.