Performanta vs Six Degrees
Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Six Degrees is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Performanta targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Six Degrees serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Performanta includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Identity), compared to 3 for Six Degrees (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Buyer brief
Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Six Degrees is a Microsoft-ecosystem that works with your existing tools. Performanta targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Six Degrees serves Mid-market and Enterprise. Performanta includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Identity), compared to 3 for Six Degrees (Endpoint, Cloud, Network).
Performanta (Services firm) and Six Degrees (Microsoft-ecosystem) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Performanta's performanta fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mdr with safe xdr, managed soc and incident-... or Six Degrees's six degrees mdr is strongest for uk organisations that want microsoft-centred mdr delivered from ....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response | UK public-sector, healthcare, legal, financial-services and regulated organisations that need UK-onshore SOC delivery |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 3/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- UK public-sector, healthcare, legal, financial-services and regulated organisations that need UK-onshore SOC delivery
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 3/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | PerformantaTECH-AGNOSTIC | Six DegreesTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: LimitedSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateContainCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ~ Limited |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Performanta does not publish MDR, Safe XDR or managed SOC package pricing. | Custom quote. Six Degrees does not publish MDR package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Public pages do not define default MDR response authority, so buyers need the managed-technology boundary in writing.. Cloud and SaaS coverage appear tied to Microsoft security controls and Safe XDR scope, so non-Microsoft telemetry should be confirmed early.. Incident response is listed as a consulting service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. | The MDR and MXDR pages describe different coverage depth, so buyers should pin down which tier is in the order form.. Microsoft Sentinel data ingestion and retention can materially affect total cost.. Public pages do not publish response SLAs or named default response actions.. UK-onshore and security-cleared delivery may be valuable for regulated buyers but can make pricing less comparable with lower-cost global MDR providers. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Safe XDR, MDR for Defender for Endpoint | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeAfrica | Europe |
| Onboarding | Not published. Performanta describes scoping, discovery, prioritisation, validation and mobilisation stages for Safe XDR, but no standard implementation duration was found. | Six Degrees publishes bespoke deployment, configuration and management. A public standard onboarding timeline was not found. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEducationHealthcareGovernmentRetailProfessional ServicesAgricultureTelecommunicationsManufacturingTransportationTourism | Public SectorCentral GovernmentLocal GovernmentCritical National InfrastructureFinancial ServicesLegalHealthcareRegulated Industries |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Performanta's Microsoft security focus, UK and South Africa SOC operations, Safe XDR platform, threat-hunting process and incident-response consulting depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, non-Microsoft telemetry support and exact incident-response inclusion directly. | Six Degrees has limited MDR-specific community signal. The public buyer case is strongest for UK-onshore delivery, Microsoft security tooling and regulated-sector fit. Treat public claims around containment and response as credible enough for MDR eligibility, but confirm the exact tier, response authority and Microsoft cost model during procurement. |
| Compliance | – | ISO 27001ISO 9001Cyber Essentials PlusCRESTCHECKCyber SchemeHMG PSNSOC 2 Type IIGDPRPCI DSS |
| Certifications | – | ISO 27001ISO 9001Cyber Essentials PlusCRESTCHECKCyber SchemeSOC 2 Type IIMicrosoft Intelligent Security AssociationMicrosoft Azure Expert MSPMicrosoft Solutions Partner for Security |
| Founded | 2010 | 2011 |
| Data retention | Not published. Performanta says it monitors customer environments and SIEM platforms, but no standard public MDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. | Not published as a standard MDR retention period. Microsoft Sentinel retention is likely governed by the deployed tenant and contract scope. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Performanta and Six Degrees?
Performanta is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Six Degrees is a Microsoft-ecosystem that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Performanta covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for Six Degrees.
How do Performanta and Six Degrees differ in response capabilities?
Performanta supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Six Degrees supports 3 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, network containment) and approval is configurable.
How does Performanta pricing compare to Six Degrees?
Performanta pricing: Not published. Six Degrees pricing: Not published. Watch for with Performanta: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Watch for with Six Degrees: The MDR and MXDR pages describe different coverage depth, so buyers should pin down which tier is in the order form.; Microsoft Sentinel data ingestion and retention can materially affect total cost..
Should I choose Performanta or Six Degrees?
Choose Performanta if: buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response. Choose Six Degrees if: uK public-sector, healthcare, legal, financial-services and regulated organisations that need UK-onshore SOC delivery. Performanta is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Six Degrees is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing or published response SLAs.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.