Performanta vs Recon InfoSec
Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Recon InfoSec is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Performanta targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Recon InfoSec serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Performanta includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Identity), compared to 5 for Recon InfoSec (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Buyer brief
Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Recon InfoSec is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Performanta targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Recon InfoSec serves SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise. Performanta includes 2 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Identity), compared to 5 for Recon InfoSec (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network).
Performanta (Services firm) and Recon InfoSec (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Performanta's performanta fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mdr with safe xdr, managed soc and incident-... or Recon InfoSec's recon infosec is a strong fit for buyers who want managed security operations with broad integrat....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response | Organizations that want MDR across existing endpoint, SIEM, cloud, identity, network and email tools |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Organizations that want MDR across existing endpoint, SIEM, cloud, identity, network and email tools
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | PerformantaTECH-AGNOSTIC | Recon InfoSecTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Positive |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | LimaCharlieCrowdStrikeSentinelOneCarbon BlackBitdefender GravityZoneBlackBerry CylanceSophosTrend MicroSymantecQualys EDRRSA NetWitness EDR Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | SplunkSumo LogicStellar CyberAlienVaultArcSightGoogle ChronicleDevoElasticExabeamFortiSIEMIBM QRadarLogPointLogRhythmLogz.ioRapid7 InsightIDRRSA NetWitness |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: CoveredIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: CoveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | ✓ Included |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| Network | ~ Limited | ✓ Included |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Performanta does not publish MDR, Safe XDR or managed SOC package pricing. | Custom pricing. No public price bands, per-user pricing or minimums found. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Public pages do not define default MDR response authority, so buyers need the managed-technology boundary in writing.. Cloud and SaaS coverage appear tied to Microsoft security controls and Safe XDR scope, so non-Microsoft telemetry should be confirmed early.. Incident response is listed as a consulting service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. | Recon MDR appears closer to full managed security operations than a narrow endpoint-only MDR SKU, so buyers should confirm the modules included in the quoted scope.. No public contractual SLA or service-credit table was found.. Default autonomous response actions are not published. Confirm which actions Recon can take without approval.. Physical SOC locations, analyst count and raw data export terms are not public. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Safe XDR, MDR for Defender for Endpoint | Custom |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeAfrica | |
| Onboarding | Not published. Performanta describes scoping, discovery, prioritisation, validation and mobilisation stages for Safe XDR, but no standard implementation duration was found. | Not published as a standard timeline. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEducationHealthcareGovernmentRetailProfessional ServicesAgricultureTelecommunicationsManufacturingTransportationTourism | Financial ServicesHealthcareOil and GasManufacturingUtilitiesGovernmentEducationConstructionRetail |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Performanta's Microsoft security focus, UK and South Africa SOC operations, Safe XDR platform, threat-hunting process and incident-response consulting depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, non-Microsoft telemetry support and exact incident-response inclusion directly. | Recon publishes a +97 NPS claim, customer testimonials, logos and public practitioner/community signals around OpenSOC, SOC X and Thursday Defensive. Independent third-party review volume is limited: no meaningful G2 or Gartner MDR review profile was found in this pass. Public community signal is sparse, so buyer validation should lean on references and proof-of-value work. |
| Compliance | – | SOC 2 Type II |
| Certifications | – | AICPA SOC 2 Type IITIPS Awarded VendorTexas DIR Approved Vendor |
| Founded | 2010 | 2018 |
| Data retention | Not published. Performanta says it monitors customer environments and SIEM platforms, but no standard public MDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. | Not published |
| API available | – | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Performanta and Recon InfoSec?
Performanta is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Recon InfoSec is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Performanta covers 2 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 5 for Recon InfoSec.
How do Performanta and Recon InfoSec differ in response capabilities?
Performanta supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Recon InfoSec supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Performanta and included with Recon InfoSec.
How does Performanta pricing compare to Recon InfoSec?
Performanta pricing: Not published. Recon InfoSec pricing: Custom pricing. No public per-user or per-endpoint price found.. Watch for with Performanta: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Watch for with Recon InfoSec: Recon MDR appears closer to full managed security operations than a narrow endpoint-only MDR SKU, so buyers should confirm the modules included in the quoted scope.; No public contractual SLA or service-credit table was found..
Should I choose Performanta or Recon InfoSec?
Choose Performanta if: buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response. Choose Recon InfoSec if: organizations that want MDR across existing endpoint, SIEM, cloud, identity, network and email tools. Performanta is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Recon InfoSec is not ideal for buyers requiring public pricing before engaging sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.