Performanta vs Pondurance
Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Pondurance is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Performanta targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Pondurance serves SMB and Mid-market.
Buyer brief
Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. Pondurance is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Performanta targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Pondurance serves SMB and Mid-market.
Performanta (Services firm) and Pondurance (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Performanta's performanta fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mdr with safe xdr, managed soc and incident-... or Pondurance's affordable, technology-agnostic mdr for us mid-market buyers in regulated industries, with a risk....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response | Organizations that want a $2M breach warranty and HITRUST readiness consulting from one vendor |
| Price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 1/6 actions · Configurable | 6/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | $2,000,000 |
- Best fit
- Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Organizations that want a $2M breach warranty and HITRUST readiness consulting from one vendor
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 6/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- $2,000,000
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | PerformantaTECH-AGNOSTIC | PonduranceTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market |
| Sentiment | Mixed | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | Microsoft Defender | CrowdStrikeSentinelOne Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Microsoft Sentinel | None listed |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: Optional add-onNetNetwork: Optional add-onOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | Custom playbooks | IsolateKill processContainDisable accountsQuarantineCustom playbooks |
| IR included | Separate | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published. Custom quotes only. Reviews describe pricing as affordable relative to competitors. |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | $2,000,000 |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Identity | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| Network | ~ Limited | + Optional |
| OT/ICS | Not offered | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quote. Performanta does not publish MDR, Safe XDR or managed SOC package pricing. | Per-endpoint for endpoint MDR. Network MDR priced by bandwidth. Log MDR priced by GB/day ingestion. Custom quotes. |
| Hidden cost warnings | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Public pages do not define default MDR response authority, so buyers need the managed-technology boundary in writing.. Cloud and SaaS coverage appear tied to Microsoft security controls and Safe XDR scope, so non-Microsoft telemetry should be confirmed early.. Incident response is listed as a consulting service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. | Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. Separate retainer required for the 2-hour response commitment.. Network MDR, Log MDR, and Pondurance for Microsoft are all separate products with separate pricing on top of endpoint MDR. RansomSnare module is a separate license on top of MDR (free promotion for new customers may be time-limited). Cloud, SaaS (M365), and network coverage each require purchasing separate product modules beyond base endpoint MDR |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Custom, Managed SOC, Safe XDR, MDR for Defender for Endpoint | Annual |
| Channels | PortalEmailPhone | EmailPortalPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | EuropeAfrica | North America |
| Onboarding | Not published. Performanta describes scoping, discovery, prioritisation, validation and mobilisation stages for Safe XDR, but no standard implementation duration was found. | Not published. Reviews describe setup as straightforward. |
| Industry focus | Financial ServicesEducationHealthcareGovernmentRetailProfessional ServicesAgricultureTelecommunicationsManufacturingTransportationTourism | HealthcareFinancial ServicesGovernmentEducationManufacturingRetail |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Under 15 minutes (vendor marketing claim, described as 'typical time to remediation') |
| Community view | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Performanta's Microsoft security focus, UK and South Africa SOC operations, Safe XDR platform, threat-hunting process and incident-response consulting depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, non-Microsoft telemetry support and exact incident-response inclusion directly. | Gartner Peer Insights 5.0/5 but only 2 reviews, too small to draw conclusions. Named in Gartner 2024 Market Guide for MDR as the only 'risk-based' vendor. Almost no presence on G2, PeerSpot, or Reddit. Glassdoor 2.4/5 (36 reviews) with recurring complaints about leadership and employee turnover. |
| Compliance | – | – |
| Certifications | – | Certified Common Security Framework Practitioners (CCSFP) on staff |
| Founded | 2010 | 2008 |
| Data retention | Not published. Performanta says it monitors customer environments and SIEM platforms, but no standard public MDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. | Not published. |
| API available | – | ✓ |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between Performanta and Pondurance?
Performanta is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Pondurance is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Performanta and Pondurance differ in response capabilities?
Performanta supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Pondurance supports 6 autonomous actions (account disable, custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable.
How does Performanta pricing compare to Pondurance?
Performanta pricing: Not published. Pondurance pricing: Not published. Custom quotes only. Reviews describe pricing as affordable relative to competitors.. Watch for with Performanta: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Watch for with Pondurance: Incident response is NOT included in base MDR. Separate retainer required for the 2-hour response commitment.; Network MDR, Log MDR, and Pondurance for Microsoft are all separate products with separate pricing on top of endpoint MDR.
Should I choose Performanta or Pondurance?
Choose Performanta if: buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response. Choose Pondurance if: uS mid-market organizations in healthcare, financial services, or government wanting affordable MDR for regulated environments. Performanta is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales. Pondurance is not ideal for international organizations needing non-US SOC coverage or multilingual support.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.