PAGO Networks vs Performanta
PAGO Networks is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. PAGO Networks targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
Buyer brief
PAGO Networks is a Pure-play MDR that works with your existing tools. Performanta is a Services firm that works with your existing tools. PAGO Networks targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Performanta serves Mid-market and Enterprise.
PAGO Networks (Pure-play MDR) and Performanta (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize PAGO Networks's apac-focused mdr with active remediation, multi-vendor edr/xdr support via stellar cyber, dark we... or Performanta's performanta fits buyers that want microsoft-centered mdr with safe xdr, managed soc and incident-....
At a glance
| FIELD |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Organizations headquartered in Korea or APAC needing MDR with Korean and Southeast Asian language support | Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response |
| Price | Not published | Custom quote |
| Response authority | 5/6 actions · Configurable | 1/6 actions · Configurable |
| Stack | Works with existing stack | Works with existing stack |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Warranty | None listed | None listed |
- Best fit
- Organizations headquartered in Korea or APAC needing MDR with Korean and Southeast Asian language support
- Price
- Not published
- Response authority
- 5/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
- Best fit
- Buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response
- Price
- Custom quote
- Response authority
- 1/6 actions · Configurable
- Stack
- Works with existing stack
- Data access
- Dashboards
- Warranty
- None listed
Detailed comparison
| FIELD | PAGO NetworksTECH-AGNOSTIC | PerformantaTECH-AGNOSTIC |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | ||
| Target size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Sentiment | Positive | Mixed |
| Your stack | ||
| Approach | Works with your tools | Works with your tools |
| EDR integrations | SentinelOneDeep Instinct | Microsoft Defender |
| SIEM integrations | Stellar Cyber Open XDR | Microsoft Sentinel |
| Coverage | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: Optional add-onIDIdentity: Not coveredSaaSSaaS: Not coveredNetNetwork: CoveredOTOT/IoT: Optional add-on | EPEndpoint: CoveredCloudCloud: LimitedIDIdentity: CoveredSaaSSaaS: LimitedNetNetwork: LimitedOTOT/IoT: Not covered |
| Response | ||
| Response type | Active Remediation | Active Remediation |
| Approval policy | Configurable | Configurable |
| Response actions | IsolateKill processContainQuarantineCustom playbooks | Custom playbooks |
| IR included | ✓ Included | Separate |
| Cost | ||
| Price range | Not published | Not published |
| Minimum seats | None | None |
| Breach warranty | – | – |
| More details | ||
| Requires own agent | No | No |
| Endpoints | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Cloud workloads | + Optional | ~ Limited |
| Identity | Not offered | ✓ Included |
| SaaS apps | Not offered | ~ Limited |
| Network | ✓ Included | ~ Limited |
| OT/ICS | + Optional | Not offered |
| Threat hunting | ✓ Included | ✓ Included |
| Response SLA | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| 24/7 coverage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | Custom quotes based on endpoint/device count and coverage scope. No published pricing tiers. | Custom quote. Performanta does not publish MDR, Safe XDR or managed SOC package pricing. |
| Hidden cost warnings | No published pricing. Requires custom quote, so budget planning without a sales call is impossible.. Requires a compatible EDR platform (SentinelOne, Deep Instinct) or integration via Stellar Cyber Open XDR. Factor in EDR licensing if you don't already have one.. OT/ICS coverage is a separate add-on via a CyberXCenter partnership, not part of the base MDR service.. Most documentation, case studies, and support materials are in Korean. English-language resources are limited. | Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.. The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost.. Public pages do not define default MDR response authority, so buyers need the managed-technology boundary in writing.. Cloud and SaaS coverage appear tied to Microsoft security controls and Safe XDR scope, so non-Microsoft telemetry should be confirmed early.. Incident response is listed as a consulting service, so buyers should confirm what is included in MDR versus a separate incident-response engagement. |
| Data portability | Partial | Partial |
| Contract terms | Annual | Custom, Managed SOC, Safe XDR, MDR for Defender for Endpoint |
| Channels | EmailPortalPhone | PortalEmailPhone |
| Data access | Dashboards | Dashboards |
| Dedicated analyst | – | – |
| SOC regions | Asia-Pacific | EuropeAfrica |
| Onboarding | Not published | Not published. Performanta describes scoping, discovery, prioritisation, validation and mobilisation stages for Safe XDR, but no standard implementation duration was found. |
| Industry focus | ManufacturingChemicalSemiconductorRetailTechnologyFinancial Services | Financial ServicesEducationHealthcareGovernmentRetailProfessional ServicesAgricultureTelecommunicationsManufacturingTransportationTourism |
| MTTD | Not published | Not published |
| MTTR | Not published | Not published |
| Community view | MSSP Alert Top 250 (2025). Gartner Peer Insights shows 5.0/5 across 50+ reviews, though most reviewers are from APAC. Great Place To Work certified 2025-2026. Very little visibility in Western cybersecurity communities. | No meaningful MDR-specific buyer-review signal was found in major English-language review communities during this pass. The public buyer case rests on Performanta's Microsoft security focus, UK and South Africa SOC operations, Safe XDR platform, threat-hunting process and incident-response consulting depth. Buyers should validate pricing, response authority, non-Microsoft telemetry support and exact incident-response inclusion directly. |
| Compliance | – | – |
| Certifications | MSSP Alert Top 250 (2025)Great Place To Work Certified 2025-2026 | – |
| Founded | 2017 | 2010 |
| Data retention | Not published | Not published. Performanta says it monitors customer environments and SIEM platforms, but no standard public MDR log-retention period or data-residency term was found. |
| API available | ✓ | – |
| Website | Visit → | Visit → |
FAQ
What is the main difference between PAGO Networks and Performanta?
PAGO Networks is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Performanta is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do PAGO Networks and Performanta differ in response capabilities?
PAGO Networks supports 5 autonomous actions (custom playbooks, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, network containment, process termination) and approval is configurable. Performanta supports 1 autonomous actions (custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with PAGO Networks and not included with Performanta.
How does PAGO Networks pricing compare to Performanta?
PAGO Networks pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Performanta pricing: Not published. Watch for with PAGO Networks: No published pricing. Requires custom quote, so budget planning without a sales call is impossible.; Requires a compatible EDR platform (SentinelOne, Deep Instinct) or integration via Stellar Cyber Open XDR. Factor in EDR licensing if you don't already have one.. Watch for with Performanta: Public pages do not publish MDR pricing, contract minimums or service-credit language.; The explicit MDR offer is tied to Defender for Endpoint, so Microsoft licensing and customer tenant readiness can drive total cost..
Should I choose PAGO Networks or Performanta?
Choose PAGO Networks if: organizations headquartered in Korea or APAC needing MDR with Korean and Southeast Asian language support. Choose Performanta if: buyers already committed to Microsoft Defender and Sentinel that want a services firm to manage detection and response. PAGO Networks is not ideal for north American or European organizations needing SOC presence in those regions (PAGO has no operational SOCs there yet). Performanta is not ideal for buyers that need public MDR pricing before sales.
Daylight Security
AI-native MDR for buyers comparing active remediation across endpoint, cloud, identity, and SaaS. Daylight works with existing EDR/SIEM stacks and uses ChatOps-native collaboration, so it can be a useful third reference point in this comparison.